[PATCH] arm: add comment about max_low_pfn/max_pfn
) From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> Oddly, max_low_pfn/max_pfn end up being the number of pages in the system, rather than the maximum PFN on ARM. This doesn't seem to cause any problems, so just add a note about it. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7a228aaa87
commit
d42ce812b8
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ find_memend_and_nodes(struct meminfo *mi, struct node_info *np)
|
|||
* This doesn't seem to be used by the Linux memory
|
||||
* manager any more. If we can get rid of it, we
|
||||
* also get rid of some of the stuff above as well.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: max_low_pfn and max_pfn reflect the number
|
||||
* of _pages_ in the system, not the maximum PFN.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
max_low_pfn = memend_pfn - O_PFN_DOWN(PHYS_OFFSET);
|
||||
max_pfn = memend_pfn - O_PFN_DOWN(PHYS_OFFSET);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue