[PATCH] arm: add comment about dma_supported()
) From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> The ARM dma_supported() is rather basic, and I don't think it takes into account everything that it should do (eg, whether the mask agrees with what we'd return for GFP_DMA allocations). Note this. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7aa52f5128
commit
7a228aaa87
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ extern void consistent_sync(void *kaddr, size_t size, int rw);
|
|||
* properly. For example, if your device can only drive the low 24-bits
|
||||
* during bus mastering, then you would pass 0x00ffffff as the mask
|
||||
* to this function.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* FIXME: This should really be a platform specific issue - we should
|
||||
* return false if GFP_DMA allocations may not satisfy the supplied 'mask'.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue