Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo e25613683b perf trace: Read_tracing_data should die() another day ... It better propagate errors, also if we do a simple: [root@doppio linux-2.6-tip]# perf record -R -a -f sleep 3s ; perf trace [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.182 MB perf.data (~7972 samples) ] Fatal: not an trace data file [root@doppio linux-2.6-tip]# That is what is expected, right? I.e. as we didn't specify any tracepoint event via -e, it should gracefully bail out and not SEGFAULT. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> LKML-Reference: <1258821086-11521-3-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> [ Fixed the error messages some more ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>		2009-11-21 17:45:59 +01:00
..
perf	perf trace: Read_tracing_data should die() another day	2009-11-21 17:45:59 +01:00