Matthew Wilcox 64ac24e738 Generic semaphore implementation ... Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the unlikely() was unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>		2008-04-17 10:42:34 -04:00
..
asm-offsets.c	rename thread_info to stack	2007-05-09 12:30:56 -07:00
entry.S
gpio.c
h8300_ksyms.c	Generic semaphore implementation	2008-04-17 10:42:34 -04:00
init_task.c
irq.c	h8300: IRQ handling update	2008-02-23 17:12:16 -08:00
Makefile	Generic semaphore implementation	2008-04-17 10:42:34 -04:00
module.c
process.c
ptrace.c
setup.c	procfs: constify function pointer tables	2008-02-08 09:22:38 -08:00
signal.c	h8300: signal.c typo fix	2008-02-23 17:12:15 -08:00
sys_h8300.c
syscalls.S
time.c	spelling fixes: arch/h8300/	2007-10-20 01:10:46 +02:00
traps.c	spelling fixes: arch/h8300/	2007-10-20 01:10:46 +02:00
vmlinux.lds.S	all archs: consolidate init and exit sections in vmlinux.lds.h	2008-01-28 23:21:17 +01:00