H. Peter Anvin ccef086454 x86, mm: Correct the implementation of is_untracked_pat_range() ... The semantics the PAT code expect of is_untracked_pat_range() is "is this range completely contained inside the untracked region." This means that checkin 8a27138924 was technically wrong, because the implementation needlessly confusing. The sane interface is for it to take a semiclosed range like just about everything else (as evidenced by the sheer number of "- 1"'s removed by that patch) so change the actual implementation to match. Reported-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> LKML-Reference: <20091119202341.GA4420@sgi.com>		2009-11-30 21:33:51 -08:00
..
asm	x86, mm: Correct the implementation of is_untracked_pat_range()	2009-11-30 21:33:51 -08:00