18cd6106cf
commit 2d84a2d19b6150c6dbac1e6ebad9c82e4c123772 upstream.
In current fuse_drop_waiting() implementation it's possible that
fuse_wait_aborted() will not be woken up in the unlikely case that
fuse_abort_conn() + fuse_wait_aborted() runs in between checking
fc->connected and calling atomic_dec(&fc->num_waiting).
Do the atomic_dec_and_test() unconditionally, which also provides the
necessary barrier against reordering with the fc->connected check.
The explicit smp_mb() in fuse_wait_aborted() is not actually needed, since
the spin_unlock() in fuse_abort_conn() provides the necessary RELEASE
barrier after resetting fc->connected. However, this is not a performance
sensitive path, and adding the explicit barrier makes it easier to
document.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Fixes:
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acl.c | ||
| control.c | ||
| cuse.c | ||
| dev.c | ||
| dir.c | ||
| file.c | ||
| fuse_i.h | ||
| inode.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| xattr.c | ||