kernel-fxtec-pro1x/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h
Linus Torvalds b862f3b099 i386: improve and correct inline asm memory constraints
Use "+m" rather than a combination of "=m" and "m" for improved clarity
and consistency.

This also fixes some inlines that incorrectly didn't tell the compiler
that they read the old value at all, potentially causing the compiler to
generate bogus code.  It appear that all of those potential bugs were
hidden by the use of extra "volatile" specifiers on the data structures
in question, though.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-07-08 15:24:18 -07:00

211 lines
4.7 KiB
C

#ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
#define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
#include <asm/atomic.h>
#include <asm/rwlock.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
/*
* Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere
*
* Simple spin lock operations. There are two variants, one clears IRQ's
* on the local processor, one does not.
*
* We make no fairness assumptions. They have a cost.
*
* (the type definitions are in asm/spinlock_types.h)
*/
#define __raw_spin_is_locked(x) \
(*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->slock) <= 0)
#define __raw_spin_lock_string \
"\n1:\t" \
"lock ; decb %0\n\t" \
"jns 3f\n" \
"2:\t" \
"rep;nop\n\t" \
"cmpb $0,%0\n\t" \
"jle 2b\n\t" \
"jmp 1b\n" \
"3:\n\t"
/*
* NOTE: there's an irqs-on section here, which normally would have to be
* irq-traced, but on CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS we never use
* __raw_spin_lock_string_flags().
*/
#define __raw_spin_lock_string_flags \
"\n1:\t" \
"lock ; decb %0\n\t" \
"jns 5f\n" \
"2:\t" \
"testl $0x200, %1\n\t" \
"jz 4f\n\t" \
"sti\n" \
"3:\t" \
"rep;nop\n\t" \
"cmpb $0, %0\n\t" \
"jle 3b\n\t" \
"cli\n\t" \
"jmp 1b\n" \
"4:\t" \
"rep;nop\n\t" \
"cmpb $0, %0\n\t" \
"jg 1b\n\t" \
"jmp 4b\n" \
"5:\n\t"
#define __raw_spin_lock_string_up \
"\n\tdecb %0"
static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
alternative_smp(
__raw_spin_lock_string,
__raw_spin_lock_string_up,
"+m" (lock->slock) : : "memory");
}
/*
* It is easier for the lock validator if interrupts are not re-enabled
* in the middle of a lock-acquire. This is a performance feature anyway
* so we turn it off:
*/
#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
{
alternative_smp(
__raw_spin_lock_string_flags,
__raw_spin_lock_string_up,
"+m" (lock->slock) : "r" (flags) : "memory");
}
#endif
static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
char oldval;
__asm__ __volatile__(
"xchgb %b0,%1"
:"=q" (oldval), "+m" (lock->slock)
:"0" (0) : "memory");
return oldval > 0;
}
/*
* __raw_spin_unlock based on writing $1 to the low byte.
* This method works. Despite all the confusion.
* (except on PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE, so we use xchgb there)
* (PPro errata 66, 92)
*/
#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
#define __raw_spin_unlock_string \
"movb $1,%0" \
:"+m" (lock->slock) : : "memory"
static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
__asm__ __volatile__(
__raw_spin_unlock_string
);
}
#else
#define __raw_spin_unlock_string \
"xchgb %b0, %1" \
:"=q" (oldval), "+m" (lock->slock) \
:"0" (oldval) : "memory"
static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
char oldval = 1;
__asm__ __volatile__(
__raw_spin_unlock_string
);
}
#endif
#define __raw_spin_unlock_wait(lock) \
do { while (__raw_spin_is_locked(lock)) cpu_relax(); } while (0)
/*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
* but only one writer.
*
* NOTE! it is quite common to have readers in interrupts
* but no interrupt writers. For those circumstances we
* can "mix" irq-safe locks - any writer needs to get a
* irq-safe write-lock, but readers can get non-irqsafe
* read-locks.
*
* On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
* with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit.
*
* The inline assembly is non-obvious. Think about it.
*
* Changed to use the same technique as rw semaphores. See
* semaphore.h for details. -ben
*
* the helpers are in arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
*/
/**
* read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
* @lock: the rwlock in question.
*/
#define __raw_read_can_lock(x) ((int)(x)->lock > 0)
/**
* write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
* @lock: the rwlock in question.
*/
#define __raw_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS)
static inline void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
__build_read_lock(rw, "__read_lock_failed");
}
static inline void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
__build_write_lock(rw, "__write_lock_failed");
}
static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
{
atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
atomic_dec(count);
if (atomic_read(count) >= 0)
return 1;
atomic_inc(count);
return 0;
}
static inline int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
{
atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
if (atomic_sub_and_test(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count))
return 1;
atomic_add(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count);
return 0;
}
static inline void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incl %0" :"+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
}
static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ", %0"
: "+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
}
#endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */