90dc7122a3
Should the call to irq_set_vcpu_affinity() fail at map time, we should restore the normal lazy-disable behaviour instead of staying with the eager disable that GICv4 requires. Reported-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
236 lines
7 KiB
C
236 lines
7 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2016,2017 ARM Limited, All Rights Reserved.
|
|
* Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
|
|
#include <linux/irq.h>
|
|
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
|
|
#include <linux/msi.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h>
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* WARNING: The blurb below assumes that you understand the
|
|
* intricacies of GICv3, GICv4, and how a guest's view of a GICv3 gets
|
|
* translated into GICv4 commands. So it effectively targets at most
|
|
* two individuals. You know who you are.
|
|
*
|
|
* The core GICv4 code is designed to *avoid* exposing too much of the
|
|
* core GIC code (that would in turn leak into the hypervisor code),
|
|
* and instead provide a hypervisor agnostic interface to the HW (of
|
|
* course, the astute reader will quickly realize that hypervisor
|
|
* agnostic actually means KVM-specific - what were you thinking?).
|
|
*
|
|
* In order to achieve a modicum of isolation, we try to hide most of
|
|
* the GICv4 "stuff" behind normal irqchip operations:
|
|
*
|
|
* - Any guest-visible VLPI is backed by a Linux interrupt (and a
|
|
* physical LPI which gets unmapped when the guest maps the
|
|
* VLPI). This allows the same DevID/EventID pair to be either
|
|
* mapped to the LPI (host) or the VLPI (guest). Note that this is
|
|
* exclusive, and you cannot have both.
|
|
*
|
|
* - Enabling/disabling a VLPI is done by issuing mask/unmask calls.
|
|
*
|
|
* - Guest INT/CLEAR commands are implemented through
|
|
* irq_set_irqchip_state().
|
|
*
|
|
* - The *bizarre* stuff (mapping/unmapping an interrupt to a VLPI, or
|
|
* issuing an INV after changing a priority) gets shoved into the
|
|
* irq_set_vcpu_affinity() method. While this is quite horrible
|
|
* (let's face it, this is the irqchip version of an ioctl), it
|
|
* confines the crap to a single location. And map/unmap really is
|
|
* about setting the affinity of a VLPI to a vcpu, so only INV is
|
|
* majorly out of place. So there.
|
|
*
|
|
* A number of commands are simply not provided by this interface, as
|
|
* they do not make direct sense. For example, MAPD is purely local to
|
|
* the virtual ITS (because it references a virtual device, and the
|
|
* physical ITS is still very much in charge of the physical
|
|
* device). Same goes for things like MAPC (the physical ITS deals
|
|
* with the actual vPE affinity, and not the braindead concept of
|
|
* collection). SYNC is not provided either, as each and every command
|
|
* is followed by a VSYNC. This could be relaxed in the future, should
|
|
* this be seen as a bottleneck (yes, this means *never*).
|
|
*
|
|
* But handling VLPIs is only one side of the job of the GICv4
|
|
* code. The other (darker) side is to take care of the doorbell
|
|
* interrupts which are delivered when a VLPI targeting a non-running
|
|
* vcpu is being made pending.
|
|
*
|
|
* The choice made here is that each vcpu (VPE in old northern GICv4
|
|
* dialect) gets a single doorbell LPI, no matter how many interrupts
|
|
* are targeting it. This has a nice property, which is that the
|
|
* interrupt becomes a handle for the VPE, and that the hypervisor
|
|
* code can manipulate it through the normal interrupt API:
|
|
*
|
|
* - VMs (or rather the VM abstraction that matters to the GIC)
|
|
* contain an irq domain where each interrupt maps to a VPE. In
|
|
* turn, this domain sits on top of the normal LPI allocator, and a
|
|
* specially crafted irq_chip implementation.
|
|
*
|
|
* - mask/unmask do what is expected on the doorbell interrupt.
|
|
*
|
|
* - irq_set_affinity is used to move a VPE from one redistributor to
|
|
* another.
|
|
*
|
|
* - irq_set_vcpu_affinity once again gets hijacked for the purpose of
|
|
* creating a new sub-API, namely scheduling/descheduling a VPE
|
|
* (which involves programming GICR_V{PROP,PEND}BASER) and
|
|
* performing INVALL operations.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static struct irq_domain *gic_domain;
|
|
static const struct irq_domain_ops *vpe_domain_ops;
|
|
|
|
int its_alloc_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm)
|
|
{
|
|
int vpe_base_irq, i;
|
|
|
|
vm->fwnode = irq_domain_alloc_named_id_fwnode("GICv4-vpe",
|
|
task_pid_nr(current));
|
|
if (!vm->fwnode)
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
vm->domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(gic_domain, 0, vm->nr_vpes,
|
|
vm->fwnode, vpe_domain_ops,
|
|
vm);
|
|
if (!vm->domain)
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
|
|
vm->vpes[i]->its_vm = vm;
|
|
vm->vpes[i]->idai = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
vpe_base_irq = __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(vm->domain, -1, vm->nr_vpes,
|
|
NUMA_NO_NODE, vm,
|
|
false, NULL);
|
|
if (vpe_base_irq <= 0)
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_vpes; i++)
|
|
vm->vpes[i]->irq = vpe_base_irq + i;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
err:
|
|
if (vm->domain)
|
|
irq_domain_remove(vm->domain);
|
|
if (vm->fwnode)
|
|
irq_domain_free_fwnode(vm->fwnode);
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void its_free_vcpu_irqs(struct its_vm *vm)
|
|
{
|
|
irq_domain_free_irqs(vm->vpes[0]->irq, vm->nr_vpes);
|
|
irq_domain_remove(vm->domain);
|
|
irq_domain_free_fwnode(vm->fwnode);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int its_send_vpe_cmd(struct its_vpe *vpe, struct its_cmd_info *info)
|
|
{
|
|
return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(vpe->irq, info);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int its_schedule_vpe(struct its_vpe *vpe, bool on)
|
|
{
|
|
struct its_cmd_info info;
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(preemptible());
|
|
|
|
info.cmd_type = on ? SCHEDULE_VPE : DESCHEDULE_VPE;
|
|
|
|
return its_send_vpe_cmd(vpe, &info);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int its_invall_vpe(struct its_vpe *vpe)
|
|
{
|
|
struct its_cmd_info info = {
|
|
.cmd_type = INVALL_VPE,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
return its_send_vpe_cmd(vpe, &info);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int its_map_vlpi(int irq, struct its_vlpi_map *map)
|
|
{
|
|
struct its_cmd_info info = {
|
|
.cmd_type = MAP_VLPI,
|
|
{
|
|
.map = map,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The host will never see that interrupt firing again, so it
|
|
* is vital that we don't do any lazy masking.
|
|
*/
|
|
irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
|
|
|
|
ret = irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, &info);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int its_get_vlpi(int irq, struct its_vlpi_map *map)
|
|
{
|
|
struct its_cmd_info info = {
|
|
.cmd_type = GET_VLPI,
|
|
{
|
|
.map = map,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, &info);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int its_unmap_vlpi(int irq)
|
|
{
|
|
irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
|
|
return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int its_prop_update_vlpi(int irq, u8 config, bool inv)
|
|
{
|
|
struct its_cmd_info info = {
|
|
.cmd_type = inv ? PROP_UPDATE_AND_INV_VLPI : PROP_UPDATE_VLPI,
|
|
{
|
|
.config = config,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(irq, &info);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int its_init_v4(struct irq_domain *domain, const struct irq_domain_ops *ops)
|
|
{
|
|
if (domain) {
|
|
pr_info("ITS: Enabling GICv4 support\n");
|
|
gic_domain = domain;
|
|
vpe_domain_ops = ops;
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pr_err("ITS: No GICv4 VPE domain allocated\n");
|
|
return -ENODEV;
|
|
}
|