kernel-fxtec-pro1x/kernel/irq
Thomas Gleixner d7226fb6ec Revert "genirq: assert that irq handlers are indeed running in hardirq context"
This reverts commit 044d408409.

The commit added a warning when handle_IRQ_event() is called outside
of hard interrupt context. This breaks the generic tasklet based
interrupt resend mechanism which is used when the hardware has no way
to retrigger the interrupt. So we get a warning for a use case which
is correct and worked for years. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2009-05-01 15:16:04 +02:00
..
autoprobe.c
chip.c Merge branch 'core/percpu' into percpu-cpumask-x86-for-linus-2 2009-03-27 17:28:43 +01:00
devres.c
handle.c Revert "genirq: assert that irq handlers are indeed running in hardirq context" 2009-05-01 15:16:04 +02:00
internals.h PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming device interrupts 2009-03-30 21:46:54 +02:00
Makefile PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming device interrupts 2009-03-30 21:46:54 +02:00
manage.c x86, irq: Remove IRQ_DISABLED check in process context IRQ move 2009-04-14 15:21:13 +02:00
migration.c
numa_migrate.c irq: fix cpumask memory leak on offstack cpumask kernels 2009-04-03 19:14:44 +02:00
pm.c PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming device interrupts 2009-03-30 21:46:54 +02:00
proc.c
resend.c
spurious.c