Sudeep Holla 5b5ccbc2b0 Revert "tick: Prefer a lower rating device only if it's CPU local device" ... This reverts commit 1332a90558. The original issue was not because of incorrect checking of cpumask for both new and old tick device. It was incorrectly analysed was due to the misunderstanding of the comment and misinterpretation of the return value from tick_check_preferred. The main issue is with the clockevent driver that sets the cpumask to cpu_all_mask instead of cpu_possible_mask. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> Tested-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531151136-18297-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com		2018-07-10 22:12:47 +02:00
..
alarmtimer.c
clockevents.c
clocksource.c
hrtimer.c
itimer.c
jiffies.c
Kconfig
Makefile
ntp.c
ntp_internal.h
posix-clock.c
posix-cpu-timers.c
posix-stubs.c
posix-timers.c
posix-timers.h
sched_clock.c
test_udelay.c
tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
tick-broadcast.c
tick-common.c	Revert "tick: Prefer a lower rating device only if it's CPU local device"	2018-07-10 22:12:47 +02:00
tick-internal.h
tick-oneshot.c
tick-sched.c
tick-sched.h
time.c
timeconst.bc
timeconv.c
timecounter.c
timekeeping.c
timekeeping.h
timekeeping_debug.c
timekeeping_internal.h
timer.c
timer_list.c