kernel-fxtec-pro1x/include/asm-i386/mach-visws/do_timer.h
Jan Beulich db753bdfc2 [PATCH] i386: fix uses of user_mode() vs. user_mode_vm()
>commit 76381fee7e
>Author: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@cl.cam.ac.uk>
>Date:   Thu Jun 23 00:08:46 2005 -0700
>
>    [PATCH] xen: x86_64: use more usermode macro
>
>    Make use of the user_mode macro where it's possible.  This is useful for Xen
>    because it will need only to redefine only the macro to a hypervisor call.

I am of the opinion that the above changeset is incomplete, i.e.  it missed
converting some previous uses of user_mode to user_mode_vm.  While most of
them could be considered just cosmetical, at least the one in die_nmi
doesn't appear to be.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-23 07:38:05 -08:00

53 lines
1.2 KiB
C

/* defines for inline arch setup functions */
#include <asm/fixmap.h>
#include <asm/i8259.h>
#include "cobalt.h"
static inline void do_timer_interrupt_hook(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/* Clear the interrupt */
co_cpu_write(CO_CPU_STAT,co_cpu_read(CO_CPU_STAT) & ~CO_STAT_TIMEINTR);
do_timer(regs);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
update_process_times(user_mode_vm(regs));
#endif
/*
* In the SMP case we use the local APIC timer interrupt to do the
* profiling, except when we simulate SMP mode on a uniprocessor
* system, in that case we have to call the local interrupt handler.
*/
#ifndef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING, regs);
#else
if (!using_apic_timer)
smp_local_timer_interrupt(regs);
#endif
}
static inline int do_timer_overflow(int count)
{
int i;
spin_lock(&i8259A_lock);
/*
* This is tricky when I/O APICs are used;
* see do_timer_interrupt().
*/
i = inb(0x20);
spin_unlock(&i8259A_lock);
/* assumption about timer being IRQ0 */
if (i & 0x01) {
/*
* We cannot detect lost timer interrupts ...
* well, that's why we call them lost, don't we? :)
* [hmm, on the Pentium and Alpha we can ... sort of]
*/
count -= LATCH;
} else {
printk("do_slow_gettimeoffset(): hardware timer problem?\n");
}
return count;
}