99b7623380
Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting in module refcount underflow. We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops and ->data. But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment) and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give some thoughts. ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for protection. rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm. And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular. We definitely don't want such modular code. Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller. So, let's nuke it. Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
afs.h | ||
afs_cm.h | ||
afs_fs.h | ||
afs_vl.h | ||
cache.c | ||
cache.h | ||
callback.c | ||
cell.c | ||
cmservice.c | ||
dir.c | ||
file.c | ||
flock.c | ||
fsclient.c | ||
inode.c | ||
internal.h | ||
Kconfig | ||
main.c | ||
Makefile | ||
misc.c | ||
mntpt.c | ||
netdevices.c | ||
proc.c | ||
rxrpc.c | ||
security.c | ||
server.c | ||
super.c | ||
vlclient.c | ||
vlocation.c | ||
vnode.c | ||
volume.c | ||
write.c |