Per the SAS spec, several types of BROADCAST CHANGE primitives
must cause re-discovery of the originating expander.
Only the standard BROADCAST CHANGE primitive was being
sent to the LIBSAS layer. The other BC primitives have been
added to the sci_phy_event_handler()
Signed-off-by: Tom Jackson <thomas.p.jackson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
domain_device ->parent conveys the same information.
Occurrences of ->is_direct_attached appear next to incomplete open-coded
versions of dev_is_sata(), clean those up as well.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Convert controller state machine warnings to emit the state number (it
missed the number to string conversion, but since these error rarely
happen not much motivation to go further).
Fix up the rnc warnings to use the state name.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
With the exception of the detached field, sg_mutex no longer adds any
locking. detached handling has been broken before and is still broken
and this patch does not seem to make things worse than they were to
begin with.
However, I have observed cases of tasks being blocked for >200s waiting
for sg_mutex. So the removal clearly adds value for very little cost.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
sfds is protected by sg_index_lock - except for sg_open(), where it
isn't. Change that and add some documentation.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Changes since v1: set_exclude now returns the new value, which gets
rid of the comma expression and the operator precedence bug. Thanks
to Douglas for spotting it.
sdp->exclude was previously protected by the BKL. The sg_mutex, which
replaced the BKL, only semi-protected it, as it was missing from
sg_release() and sg_proc_seq_show_debug(). Take an explicit spinlock
for it.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
srp->done is protected by sfp->rq_list_lock everywhere, except for this
one case. Result can be that the wake-up happens before the cacheline
with the changed srp->done has arrived, so the waiter can go back to
sleep and never be woken up again.
The wait_event_interruptible() means that anyone trying to debug this
unlikely race will likely notice everything working fine again, as the
next signal will unwedge things. Evil.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
After sg_release() has been called, noone should be able to actually use
that filedescriptor anymore. So if closed ever made a difference in the
past five years or so, it would have meant a bug. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
[jejb: fix up checkpatch warnings]
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Afaics the use of __wait_event_interruptible() as opposed to
wait_event_interruptible() is purely historic. So let's follow the rest
of the kernel and check the condition before prepare_to_wait() - and
also make the code a bit nicer.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
The while (1) construct isn't actually a loop at all. So let's not
pretent and obfuscate the code.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
blocking is de-facto a constant and the now-removed comment wasn't all
that useful either. Without them and the resulting indentation the code
is a bit nicer to read.
Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Dial back the aggressiveness of the controller lockup detection thread.
Currently it will declare the controller to be locked up if it goes
for 10 seconds with no interrupts and no change in the heartbeat
register. Dial back this to 30 seconds with no heartbeat change, and
also snoop the ioctl path and if a firmware flash command is detected,
dial it back further to 4 minutes until the firmware flash command
completes. The reason for this is that during the firmware flash
operation, the controller apparently doesn't update the heartbeat
register as frequently as it is supposed to, and we can get a false
positive.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Use spinlocks with finer granularity in the submission and
completion paths to allow concurrent execution for multiple
reply queues. In particular, do not hold a spin lock while
submitting a request to the device, nor during most of the
interrupt handler.
Signed-off-by: Matt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Smart Arrays can support multiple reply queues onto which command
completions may be deposited. It can help performance quite a bit
to arrange for command completions to be processed on the same CPU
from which they were submitted to increase the likelihood of cache
hits.
Signed-off-by: Matt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
This is in order to smooth the way for upcoming changes to allow use of
multiple reply queues for command completions.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Gates <matthew.gates@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
When aborting a command, the tag is supposed to be
specified as 64-bit little endian. However, some smart
arrays expect the tag of the command to be aborted to be
specified in a strange byte order. How to tell which sort
of Smart Array firmware we're dealing with is not obvious.
However, because of the way we construct our tags, the values
of any outstanding tag when specified with the "strange" byte
order will not collide with the value specified in the correct
order. That means we can safely attempt the abort both ways.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <stephenmcameron@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Instead of giving up after 3 immediate retries of driver initiated
commands, back off the rate of retries and retry a bunch more times.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
In shared SAS configurations we might get a busy status
during driver initiated commands (e.g. during rescan for
devices). We should retry the command in such cases rather
than giving up.
Signed-off-by: Matt Bondurant <Matthew.dav.bondurant@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
MSI/MSI-X interrupts can't race the DMA completion they are communicating
so no need to read from controller to flush the DMA to the host if
MSI or MSI-X interrupts are being used.
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
