Now that VFS check for inode->i_nlink == 0 and returns proper
error, remove similar check from file system
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This gives the filesystem more information about the writeback that
is happening. Trond requested this for the NFS unstable write handling,
and other filesystems might benefit from this too by beeing able to
distinguish between the different callers in more detail.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Consider a scenario when 'vfs_link(dirA/fileA)' and
'vfs_unlink(dirA/fileA, dirB/fileB)' race. 'vfs_link()' does not
lock 'dirA->i_mutex', so this is possible. Both of the functions
lock 'fileA->i_mutex' though. Suppose 'vfs_unlink()' wins, and takes
'fileA->i_mutex' mutex first. Suppose 'fileA->i_nlink' is 1. In this
case 'ubifs_unlink()' will drop the last reference, and put 'inodeA'
to the list of orphans. After this, 'vfs_link()' will link
'dirB/fileB' to 'inodeA'. Thir is a problem because, for example,
the subsequent 'vfs_unlink(dirB/fileB)' will add the same inode
to the list of orphans.
This problem was reported by J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
[Artem: add more comments, amended commit message]
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
This patch simplifies lock_[23]_inodes functions. We do not have
to care about locking order, because UBIFS does this for @i_mutex
and this is enough. Thanks to Al Viro for suggesting this.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Conflicts:
fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
Manually fixed above to use new creds API functions, e.g.
nfs4_save_creds().
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Wrap access to task credentials so that they can be separated more easily from
the task_struct during the introduction of COW creds.
Change most current->(|e|s|fs)[ug]id to current_(|e|s|fs)[ug]id().
Change some task->e?[ug]id to task_e?[ug]id(). In some places it makes more
sense to use RCU directly rather than a convenient wrapper; these will be
addressed by later patches.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
We print 'ino_t' type using '%lu' printk() placeholder, but this
results in many warnings when compiling for Alpha platform. Fix
this by adding (unsingned long) casts.
Fixes these warnings:
fs/ubifs/journal.c:693: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/journal.c:1131: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/dir.c:163: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/tnc.c:2680: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/tnc.c:2700: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/replay.c:1066: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:108: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:135: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:142: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:154: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:159: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:451: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:539: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:612: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:843: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:856: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1438: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1443: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1475: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1495: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:105: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:105: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:110: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:110: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:114: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:114: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:118: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:118: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1591: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1671: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1674: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1680: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1699: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1788: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1821: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1833: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1924: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1932: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1938: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1945: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1953: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1960: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1967: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1973: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1988: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1991: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:2009: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'ino_t'
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Noticed by sparse:
fs/ubifs/file.c:75:2: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
fs/ubifs/file.c:629:4: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
fs/ubifs/dir.c:431:3: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
This should be checked to ensure the ubifs_assert is working as
intended, I've done the suggested annotation in this patch.
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: expected int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident>
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] atime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] ctime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] mtime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
This looks like a bugfix as your tmp was a u32 so there was truncation in
the atime, mtime, ctime value, probably not intentional, add a tmp_le64
and use it here.
fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/key.h:419:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
Read from the annotated union member instead.
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: got restricted __le32 [usertype] flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: expected restricted __le32 [usertype] flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags
Do byteshifting at compile time of the flag value. Annotate the saved_flags
as le32.
fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast from restricted __le64
Should be checked if the truncation was intentional, I've changed the
printk to print the full width.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
fs/ubifs/dir.c:428: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long
unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'long unsigned int'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:541: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long
unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int'
Signed-off-by: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Always allow truncations to zero, even if budgeting thinks there
is no space. UBIFS reserves some space for deletions anyway.
Otherwise, the following happans:
1. create a file, and write as much as possible there, until ENOSPC
2. truncate the file, which fails with ENOSPC, which is not good.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Commit d70b67c8bc fixed VFS and
it never calls FS lookup function in deleted directories now.
We may remove corresponding UBIFS check.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
UBIFS does not presently re-use inode numbers, so leaving
i_generation zero is most appropriate for now.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
UBIFS aligns node lengths to 8, so budgeting has to do the
same. Well, direntry, inode, and page budgets are already
aligned, but not inode data budget (e.g., data in special
devices or symlinks). Do this for inode data as well.
Also, add corresponding debugging checks.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
The 'ubifs_release_dirty_inode_budget()' was buggy and incorrectly
freed the budget, which led to not freeing all dirty data budget.
This patch fixes that.
Also, this patch fixes ubifs_mkdir() which passed 1 in dirty_ino_d,
which makes no sense. Well, it is harmless though.
Also, add few more useful assertions. And improve few debugging
messages.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
This is a new flash file system. See
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
