If an ARM system has multiple cpus in the same socket and the
kernel is booted with maxcpus=1, secondary cpus are possible but
not present due to how platform_smp_prepare_cpus() is called.
Since most typical ARM processors don't actually support physical
hotplug, initialize the present map to be equal to the possible
map in generic ARM SMP code. Also, always call
platform_smp_prepare_cpus() as long as max_cpus is non-zero (0
means no SMP) to allow platform code to do any SMP setup.
After applying this patch it's possible to boot an ARM system
with maxcpus=1 on the command line and then hotplug in secondary
cpus via sysfs. This is more in line with how x86 does things.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Commit e2a083dc0da9aa6437e14811198379b18cdfa7f8
"ARM: consolidate SMP cross call implementation" broke the ux500
compilation since the smp.h header declared a function called
from headsmp.S. This fixes it up by declaring it locally instead.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Rather than having each platform class provide a mach/smp.h header for
smp_cross_call(), arrange for them to register the function with the
core ARM SMP code instead.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
To allow the possiblity of building U8500 and U5500 support in the same
image.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
[Rebased to latest changes in Russells tree]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
There is a subtle race in the CPU hotplug code, where a CPU which has
been offlined can online itself before being requested, which results
in things going astray on the next online/offline cycle.
What happens in the normal online/offline/online cycle is:
CPU0 CPU3
requests boot of CPU3
pen_release = 3
flush cache line
checks pen_release, reads 3
starts boot
pen_release = -1
... requests CPU3 offline ...
... dies ...
checks pen_release, reads -1
requests boot of CPU3
pen_release = 3
flush cache line
checks pen_release, reads 3
starts boot
pen_release = -1
However, as the write of -1 of pen_release is not fully flushed back to
memory, and the checking of pen_release is done with caches disabled,
this allows CPU3 the opportunity to read the old value of pen_release:
CPU0 CPU3
requests boot of CPU3
pen_release = 3
flush cache line
checks pen_release, reads 3
starts boot
pen_release = -1
... requests CPU3 offline ...
... dies ...
checks pen_release, reads 3
starts boot
pen_release = -1
requests boot of CPU3
pen_release = 3
flush cache line
Fix this by grouping the write of pen_release along with its cache line
flushing code to ensure that any update to pen_release is always pushed
out to physical memory.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
All platforms call trace_hardirqs_off() in their secondary startup code,
so move this into the core SMP code - it doesn't need to be in the
per-platform code.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
There is a certain amount of smp_prepare_cpus() which doesn't belong
in the platform support code - that is, code which is invariant to the
SMP implementation. Move this code into arch/arm/kernel/smp.c, and
add a platform_ prefix to the original function.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
scu_get_core_count() never returns zero cores, so we don't need to
check and correct if ncores is zero.
Tegra was missing the check against NR_CPUS, leading to a potential
bitfield overflow if this becomes the case.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Ensure that the number of CPUs is sanity checked before setting
the number of possible CPUs. This avoids any chance of overflowing
the cpu_possible bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
We don't need to re-pass the base address for the CPU interfaces to the
GIC for secondary CPUs, as it will never be different from the boot CPU
- and even if it was, we'd overwrite the boot CPU's base address.
Get rid of this argument, and rename to gic_secondary_init().
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This allows us to use smp_cross_call() to trigger a number of different
software generated interrupts, rather than combining them all on one
SGI. Recover the SGI number via do_IPI.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
So that the correct addresses get used on U5500.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This enables the l2x0 support and ensures that the secondary
CPU can see the page table and secondary data at this point.
Signed-off-by: srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Adds core support for the ST-Ericsson U8500
platform. It supports memory mappings, binds to
the existing modules like GIC, SCU, TWD and
local timers and sets up the infrastructure for
the secondary core.
Reviewed-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@unipv.it>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo <andrea.gallo@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
