When converting to a shared library in ac5a181d06 ("cpupower: Add
cpuidle parts into library"), cpu_freq_cpu_exists() was converted to
cpupower_is_cpu_online(). cpu_req_cpu_exists() returned 0 on success and
-ENOSYS on failure whereas cpupower_is_cpu_online returns 1 on success.
Check for the correct return value in cpufreq-set.
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374212
Fixes: ac5a181d06 (cpupower: Add cpuidle parts into library)
Reported-by: Julian Seward <jseward@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>
Cc: 4.7+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.7+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This more or less is a renaming and moving of functions and should not
introduce any functional change.
cpupower was built from cpufrequtils (which had a C library providing easy
access to cpu frequency platform info). In the meantime it got enhanced
by quite some neat cpuidle userspace tools.
Now the cpu idle functions have been separated and added to the cpupower.so
library.
So beside an already existing public header file:
cpufreq.h
cpupower now also exports these cpu idle functions in:
cpuidle.h
Here again pasted for better review of the interfaces:
======================================
int cpuidle_is_state_disabled(unsigned int cpu,
unsigned int idlestate);
int cpuidle_state_disable(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int idlestate,
unsigned int disable);
unsigned long cpuidle_state_latency(unsigned int cpu,
unsigned int idlestate);
unsigned long cpuidle_state_usage(unsigned int cpu,
unsigned int idlestate);
unsigned long long cpuidle_state_time(unsigned int cpu,
unsigned int idlestate);
char *cpuidle_state_name(unsigned int cpu,
unsigned int idlestate);
char *cpuidle_state_desc(unsigned int cpu,
unsigned int idlestate);
unsigned int cpuidle_state_count(unsigned int cpu);
char *cpuidle_get_governor(void);
char *cpuidle_get_driver(void);
======================================
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch tries to creates a common structure initialization
within the cpupower tool.
Previously the ``struct option`` was initialized
using `designated initializer` technique which was
not needed. There were conflicting initialization methods seen with
bench/main.c & others.
Signed-off-by: Sriram Raghunathan <sriram@marirs.net.in>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Check if the cpu is online before changing the frequency/governor of
the cpu.
Reported-by: Pavaman Subramaniyam <pavsubra@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Remove double checks, and move the call to print_error to the
first check. Replace break by return, and return 0 on success.
The simplified version of the coccinelle semantic patch that
fixes this issue is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@
expression E; identifier pr; expression list es;
@@
for(...;...;...){
...
- if (E) break;
+ if (E){
+ pr(es);
+ break;
+ }
...
}
- if(E) pr(es);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq-set tool has a missing length check. This is basically
just correctness but still should get fixed.
One of a set of sscanf problems reported by Jackie Chang
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
[rjw: Subject]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Instead of printing something non-formatted to stdout, call
man(1) to show the man page for the proper subcommand.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
CPU power consumption vs performance tuning is no longer
limited to CPU frequency switching anymore: deep sleep states,
traditional dynamic frequency scaling and hidden turbo/boost
frequencies are tied close together and depend on each other.
The first two exist on different architectures like PPC, Itanium and
ARM, the latter (so far) only on X86. On X86 the APU (CPU+GPU) will
only run most efficiently if CPU and GPU has proper power management
in place.
Users and Developers want to have *one* tool to get an overview what
their system supports and to monitor and debug CPU power management
in detail. The tool should compile and work on as many architectures
as possible.
Once this tool stabilizes a bit, it is intended to replace the
Intel-specific tools in tools/power/x86
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
