After "dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps", the
assembler gives the following compile error. The error is in
dumpstack_64.c.
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:720: Error: Incorrect register `%rbx' used with `l' suffix
{standard input}:1340: Error: Incorrect register `%r12' used with `l' suffix
Indeed the suffix in get_bp() was wrong.
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- define STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE and use it
- define get_bp macro to hide the %%ebp/%%rbp difference
- i386: check task==NULL in dump_trace, like x86_64
- i386: show_trace(NULL, ...) uses current automatically
- x86_64: use [#%d] for die_counter, like i386
- whitespace and comments
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- x86: Write log_lvl strings if available
- start raw stack dumps on new line
- i386: Remove extra indentation for raw stack dumps
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- i386 and x86_64: always printk the 'data' parameter
- i386: announce stack switch (irq -> normal)
- i386: check if there is a stack switch before announcing it
There is a warning that 'context' might come out corrupt in early
boot. If this is true it should be fixed, not worked around.
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Add "end" parameter to valid_stack_ptr and print_context_stack
- use sizeof(long) as the size of a word on the stack
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- x86_64: use %p to print an address
- make i386-version the same as the above
The result should be the same on x86_64; on i386 the
output only changes if CONFIG_KALLSYMS is turned off,
in which case the address is printed twice.
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The dumpstack code is logically quite independent from the
hardware traps. Split it out into its own file.
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
