boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead;
Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed
not to be there yet.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are
legitimate uses for such argument. And getting rid of that
completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple
of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
vfs_create() ignores everything outside of 16bit subset of its
mode argument; switching it to umode_t is obviously equivalent
and it's the only caller of the method
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
vfs_mkdir() gets int, but immediately drops everything that might not
fit into umode_t and that's the only caller of ->mkdir()...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
granted, on a filesystem that has only regular files and directories
it happens to work, but really should be S_ISDIR(mode)...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
omfs does not have problems with references to unlinked directories.
CC: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
CC: linux-karma-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Only a few file systems need this. Start by pushing it down into each
rename method (except gfs2 and xfs) so that it can be dealt with on a
per-fs basis.
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Only a few file systems need this. Start by pushing it down into each
fs rmdir method (except gfs2 and xfs) so it can be dealt with on a per-fs
basis.
This does not change behavior for any in-tree file systems.
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
filldir returning an error does *not* mean "skip this entry, try the
next one"...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
In case of directory-overwriting rename(), omfs forgot to mark the
victim doomed, so omfs_evict_inode() didn't free it.
We could fix that by calling omfs_rmdir() for directory victims
instead of doing omfs_unlink(), but it's easier to merge omfs_unlink()
and omfs_rmdir() instead. Note that we have no hardlinks here.
It also makes the checks in omfs_rename() go away - they fold into
what omfs_remove() does when it runs into a directory.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Since omfs directories are hashes of inodes and name is part of
inode, we have to remove inode from old directory before we can
put it into new one / under new name. So instead of
bump i_nlink
call omfs_unlink, which does
omfs_delete_entry()
decrement i_nlink and mark parent dirty in case of success
decrement i_nlink if omfs_unlink failed and hadn't done it itself
let's just call omfs_delete_entry() and dirty the parent ourselves...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
we *do* mark it dirty before, but it doesn't guarantee that we
don't get preempted just before assignment to ->i_ctime, with
inode getting written out before we get CPU back...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
In case of filesystem corruption, passing unchecked block numbers into
sb_bread can result in an infinite loop in __getblk(). Introduce a wrapper
function omfs_sbread() to check the block numbers and to also perform the
clus_to_blk() scaling.
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
With this patch all directory fops instances that have a readdir
that doesn't take the BKL are switched to generic_file_llseek.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Missing cpu_to_be64 on some constant assignments.
fs/omfs/dir.c:107:16: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/omfs/dir.c:107:16: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] i_sibling
fs/omfs/dir.c:107:16: got unsigned long long
fs/omfs/file.c:33:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/omfs/file.c:33:13: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] e_next
fs/omfs/file.c:33:13: got unsigned long long
fs/omfs/file.c:36:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/omfs/file.c:36:24: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] e_cluster
fs/omfs/file.c:36:24: got unsigned long long
fs/omfs/file.c:37:23: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/omfs/file.c:37:23: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] e_blocks
fs/omfs/file.c:37:23: got unsigned long long
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness)
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18: expected unsigned long volatile *addr
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18: got long *<noident>
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness)
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20: expected unsigned long volatile *addr
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20: got long *<noident>
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness)
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17: expected unsigned long volatile *addr
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17: got long *<noident>
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add lookup and directory management routines for OMFS. The filesystem uses
hashing based on the filename and stores collisions, unordered, in siblings
of files' inode structures. To support telldir, the current position in
the hash table is encoded in fpos.
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
