The OF code uses irqsafe locks everywhere except in a handful of functions
for no obvious reasons. Since the conversion from the old rwlocks, this
now triggers lockdep warnings when used at interrupt time. At least one
driver (ibmvscsi) seems to be doing that from softirq context.
This converts the few non-irqsafe locks into irqsafe ones, making them
consistent with the rest of the code.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
With the locking cleanup in place (from "OF: Fixup resursive
locking code paths"), we can now do the conversion from the
rw_lock to a raw spinlock as required for preempt-rt.
The previous cleanup and this conversion were originally
separate since they predated when mainline got raw spinlock (in
commit c2f21ce2e3 "locking: Implement new raw_spinlock").
So, at that point in time, the cleanup was considered plausible
for mainline, but not this conversion. In any case, we've kept
them separate as it makes for easier review and better bisection.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[PG: taken from preempt-rt, update subject & add a commit log]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> reported following error:
In file included from arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c:26:0:
arch/sparc/include/asm/leon.h:221:9: error: unknown type name 'irq_flow_handler_t'
arch/sparc/include/asm/leon.h:224:10: error: unknown type name 'irq_flow_handler_t'
Fix this by:
1) Avoid including leon.h in prom_commen.h (not needed)
2) Include irq.h in leon.h to avoid the missing symbol error
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Many of the core sparc kernel files are not modules, but just
including module.h for exporting symbols. Now these files can
use the lighter footprint export.h for this role.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Rather than assuming an architecture defines prom_getchild and friends,
define an ops struct with hooks for the various prom functions that
pdt.c needs. This ops struct is filled in by the
arch-(and sometimes firmware-)specific code, and passed to
of_pdt_build_devicetree.
Update sparc code to define the ops struct as well.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Clean up pdt.c:
- make build dependent upon config OF_PROMTREE
- #ifdef out the sparc-specific stuff
- create pdt-specific header
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Transitioning into making this useful for architectures other than sparc.
This is a verbatim copy of all functions/variables that've been moved.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Rename is_root_node() to of_node_is_root() and make it available for
all archs to use, as it's not PROM-specific.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Merge common function between powerpc, sparc and microblaze. Code is
identical for powerpc and microblaze, but adds a lock (and release) of
the devtree_lock on sparc.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for PowerPC
and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the
difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple
of years. This patch renames both to simply .phandle.
Note: the .node also existed in PowerPC/MicroBlaze, but the only user
seems to be arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pfunc_core.c. It doesn't
look like the assignment between .linux_phandle and .node is
significantly different enough to warrant the separate code paths
unless ibm,phandle properties actually appear in Apple device trees.
I think it is safe to eliminate the old .node property and use
phandle everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
The device is a AMBA bus if it is a child of prom node "ambapp" (AMBA
plug and play). Two functions
leon_trans_init() and leon_node_init() (defined in
sparc/kernel/leon_kernel.c) are called in the
prom_build_tree() path if CONFIG_SPARC_LEON is
defined. leon_node_init() will build up the device
tree using AMBA plug and play. Also: a extra check was addes to
prom_common.c:build_one_prop()
in case a rom-node is undefined which can happen for SPARC-LEON
because it creates only a minimum
nodes to emulate sparc behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Eisele <konrad@gaisler.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We need to split up the cpu present mask setup from the cpu_data
initialization, and this is a first step towards that.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
prom_nextprop() and prom_firstprop() have slightly different calling
conventions in 32 and 64 bit SPARC.
prom_common.c uses a ifdef guard to ensure that these functions are
called correctly.
Adjust code to eliminate this ifdef by using a calling convention that
is compatible with both 32 and 64 bit SPARC.
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This broke sparc64 in various ways.
Add an empty dummy hook in sparc32's prom_32.c so that we
can potentially handle things on that side similarly, and
in particular avoid a prom_common.c ifdef :-)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Unfortunately there is some sparc32/sparc64 ifdef'ery in
here due to the difference in how the prom_firstprop()
and prom_nextprop() routines work.
This will be eliminated eventually.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This is where common code implementations will go as we unify
32-bit and 64-bit OF device tree code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
