Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
H. Peter Anvin
849bf3a09f parisc: types: use <asm-generic/int-*.h> for the parisc architecture
This modifies <asm-parisc/types.h> to use the <asm-generic/int-*.h>
generic include files.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
2008-05-02 16:18:32 -07:00
Olaf Hering
68a9bd0cd5 remove strict ansi check from __u64 in asm/types.h
Remove the __STRICT_ANSI__ check from the __u64/__s64 declaration on
32bit targets.

GCC can be made to warn about usage of long long types with ISO C90
(-ansi), but only with -pedantic.  You can write this in a way that even
then it doesn't cause warnings, namely by:

#ifdef __GNUC__
__extension__ typedef __signed__ long long __s64;
__extension__ typedef unsigned long long __u64;
#endif

The __extension__ keyword in front of this switches off any pedantic
warnings for this expression.

Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-17 08:42:53 -07:00
Helge Deller
513e7ecd69 [PARISC] convert to use CONFIG_64BIT instead of __LP64__
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
2007-02-17 01:17:13 -05:00
Grant Grundler
a366064c3f [PARISC] Update bitops from parisc tree
Optimize ext2_find_next_zero_bit. Gives about 25% perf improvement with a
rsync test with ext3.

Signed-off-by: Randolph Chung <tausq@parisc-linux.org>

fix ext3 performance - ext2_find_next_zero() was culprit.
Kudos to jejb for pointing out the the possibility that ext2_test_bit
and ext2_find_next_zero() may in fact not be enumerating bits in
the bitmap because of endianess. Took sparc64 implementation and
adapted it to our tree. I suspect the real problem is ffz() wants
an unsigned long and was getting garbage in the top half of the
unsigned int. Not confirmed but that's what I suspect.

Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>

Fix find_next_bit for 32-bit
Make masking consistent for bitops

From: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
Signed-off-by: Randolph Chung <tausq@parisc-linux.org>

Add back incorrectly removed ext2_find_first_zero_bit definition

Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>

Fixup bitops.h to use volatile for *_bit() ops

Based on this email thread:
       http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108826637900003

In a nutshell:
        *_bit() want use of volatile.
        __*_bit() are "relaxed" and don't use spinlock or volatile.

other minor changes:
o replaces hweight64() macro with alias to generic_hweight64() (Joel Soete)
o cleanup ext2* macros so (a) it's obvious what the XOR magic is about
  and (b) one version that works for both 32/64-bit.
o replace 2 uses of CONFIG_64BIT with __LP64__. bitops.h used both.
  I think header files that might go to user space should use
  something userspace will know about (__LP64__).

Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>

Move SHIFT_PER_LONG to standard location for BITS_PER_LONG (asm/types.h)
and ditch the second definition of BITS_PER_LONG in bitops.h

Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>

Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
2005-10-21 22:45:22 -04:00
Kyle Moffett
fa5b08d5f8 [PATCH] sab: consolidate kmem_bufctl_t
This is used only in slab.c and each architecture gets to define whcih
underlying type is to be used.

Seems a bit silly - move it to slab.c and use the same type for all
architectures: unsigned int.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-05 00:05:48 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00