Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rusty Russell
4595f9620c x86: change flush_tlb_others to take a const struct cpumask
Impact: reduce stack usage, use new cpumask API.

This is made a little more tricky by uv_flush_tlb_others which
actually alters its argument, for an IPI to be sent to the remaining
cpus in the mask.

I solve this by allocating a cpumask_var_t for this case and falling back
to IPI should this fail.

To eliminate temporaries in the caller, all flush_tlb_others implementations
now do the this-cpu-elimination step themselves.

Note also the curious "cpus_or(f->flush_cpumask, cpumask, f->flush_cpumask)"
which has been there since pre-git and yet f->flush_cpumask is always zero
at this point.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
2009-01-11 19:13:06 +01:00
Jaswinder Singh Rajput
fa95826fe0 x86: uv_bau.h: fix dubious bitfield
Impact: cleanup, avoid sparse warnings

declare bitfield as unsigned to avoid dubious bitfield issue

 CHECK   arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.c
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:136:22: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:138:25: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:140:15: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:143:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:146:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:149:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:151:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:155:14: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:159:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:173:19: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:181:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:185:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:188:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

 CHECK   arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:136:22: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:138:25: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:140:15: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:143:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:146:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:149:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:151:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:155:14: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:159:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:173:19: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:181:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:185:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:188:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-12-30 13:31:37 -08:00
H. Peter Anvin
05e4d3169b x86: drop double underscores from header guards
Drop double underscores from header guards in arch/x86/include.  They
are used inconsistently, and are not necessary.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-23 00:01:39 -07:00
H. Peter Anvin
1965aae3c9 x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:

a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:23 -07:00
Al Viro
bb8985586b x86, um: ... and asm-x86 move
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:20 -07:00
Renamed from include/asm-x86/uv/uv_bau.h (Browse further)