nilfs2: fix timing issue between rmcp and chcp ioctls
The checkpoint deletion ioctl (rmcp ioctl) has potential for breaking snapshot because it is not fully exclusive with checkpoint mode change ioctl (chcp ioctl). The rmcp ioctl first tests if the specified checkpoint is a snapshot or not within nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoint function, and then calls nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints function to actually invalidate the checkpoint only if it's not a snapshot. However, the checkpoint can be changed into a snapshot by the chcp ioctl between these two operations. In that case, calling nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints() wrongly invalidates the snapshot, which leads to snapshot list corruption and snapshot count mismatch. This fixes the issue by changing nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints() so that it reconfirms the target checkpoints are snapshot or not. This second check is exclusive with the chcp operation since it is protected by an existing semaphore. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
278038ac53
commit
fe0627e7b3
1 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ int nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints(struct inode *cpfile,
|
|||
__u64 cno;
|
||||
void *kaddr;
|
||||
unsigned long tnicps;
|
||||
int ret, ncps, nicps, count, i;
|
||||
int ret, ncps, nicps, nss, count, i;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(start == 0 || start > end)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: invalid range of checkpoint numbers: "
|
||||
|
@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ int nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints(struct inode *cpfile,
|
|||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
goto out_sem;
|
||||
tnicps = 0;
|
||||
nss = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (cno = start; cno < end; cno += ncps) {
|
||||
ncps = nilfs_cpfile_checkpoints_in_block(cpfile, cno, end);
|
||||
|
@ -318,8 +319,9 @@ int nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints(struct inode *cpfile,
|
|||
cpfile, cno, cp_bh, kaddr);
|
||||
nicps = 0;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ncps; i++, cp = (void *)cp + cpsz) {
|
||||
WARN_ON(nilfs_checkpoint_snapshot(cp));
|
||||
if (!nilfs_checkpoint_invalid(cp)) {
|
||||
if (nilfs_checkpoint_snapshot(cp)) {
|
||||
nss++;
|
||||
} else if (!nilfs_checkpoint_invalid(cp)) {
|
||||
nilfs_checkpoint_set_invalid(cp);
|
||||
nicps++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -364,6 +366,8 @@ int nilfs_cpfile_delete_checkpoints(struct inode *cpfile,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
brelse(header_bh);
|
||||
if (nss > 0)
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
|
||||
out_sem:
|
||||
up_write(&NILFS_MDT(cpfile)->mi_sem);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue