gpio: etraxfs: make use of raw_spinlock variants
The etraxfs gpio driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary for the irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a a real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping" spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips. A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock. Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a080ce53ee
commit
f9c56536d5
1 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
|
|||
struct etraxfs_gpio_info;
|
||||
|
||||
struct etraxfs_gpio_block {
|
||||
spinlock_t lock;
|
||||
raw_spinlock_t lock;
|
||||
u32 mask;
|
||||
u32 cfg;
|
||||
u32 pins;
|
||||
|
@ -233,10 +233,10 @@ static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
|
|||
struct etraxfs_gpio_block *block = chip->block;
|
||||
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
block->mask &= ~BIT(grpirq);
|
||||
writel(block->mask, block->regs + block->info->rw_intr_mask);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
|
||||
|
@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
|
|||
struct etraxfs_gpio_block *block = chip->block;
|
||||
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
block->mask |= BIT(grpirq);
|
||||
writel(block->mask, block->regs + block->info->rw_intr_mask);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
|
||||
|
@ -280,11 +280,11 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
block->cfg &= ~(0x7 << (grpirq * 3));
|
||||
block->cfg |= (cfg << (grpirq * 3));
|
||||
writel(block->cfg, block->regs + block->info->rw_intr_cfg);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *d)
|
|||
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
|
||||
int ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
if (block->group[grpirq])
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *d)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -327,10 +327,10 @@ static void etraxfs_gpio_irq_release_resources(struct irq_data *d)
|
|||
struct etraxfs_gpio_block *block = chip->block;
|
||||
unsigned int grpirq = etraxfs_gpio_to_group_irq(d->hwirq);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&block->lock);
|
||||
block->group[grpirq] = 0;
|
||||
gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&chip->gc, d->hwirq);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&block->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct irq_chip etraxfs_gpio_irq_chip = {
|
||||
|
@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int etraxfs_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
|||
if (!block)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&block->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_init(&block->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
block->regs = regs;
|
||||
block->info = info;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue