cfg80211: make regulatory_update() static
Now that we have wiphy_regulatory_register() we can tuck away the core's regulatory_update() call there and make it static. Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bfead0808c
commit
f8a1c77457
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -543,7 +543,6 @@ int wiphy_register(struct wiphy *wiphy)
|
|||
|
||||
/* set up regulatory info */
|
||||
wiphy_regulatory_register(wiphy);
|
||||
regulatory_update(wiphy, NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_CORE);
|
||||
|
||||
list_add_rcu(&rdev->list, &cfg80211_rdev_list);
|
||||
cfg80211_rdev_list_generation++;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1232,8 +1232,8 @@ static void wiphy_update_regulatory(struct wiphy *wiphy,
|
|||
wiphy->reg_notifier(wiphy, last_request);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void regulatory_update(struct wiphy *wiphy,
|
||||
enum nl80211_reg_initiator setby)
|
||||
static void regulatory_update(struct wiphy *wiphy,
|
||||
enum nl80211_reg_initiator setby)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_lock(®_mutex);
|
||||
wiphy_update_regulatory(wiphy, setby);
|
||||
|
@ -2388,6 +2388,8 @@ void wiphy_regulatory_register(struct wiphy *wiphy)
|
|||
reg_num_devs_support_basehint++;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(®_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
regulatory_update(wiphy, NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_CORE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Caller must hold cfg80211_mutex */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ void regulatory_exit(void);
|
|||
|
||||
int set_regdom(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *rd);
|
||||
|
||||
void regulatory_update(struct wiphy *wiphy, enum nl80211_reg_initiator setby);
|
||||
bool reg_last_request_cell_base(void);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue