ARM: 7356/1: perf: check that we have an event in the PMU IRQ handlers
The PMU IRQ handlers in perf assume that if a counter has overflowed then perf must be responsible. In the paranoid world of crazy hardware, this could be false, so check that we do have a valid event before attempting to dereference NULL in the interrupt path. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
99c1745b9c
commit
f6f5a30c83
3 changed files with 12 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -467,23 +467,6 @@ armv6pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
|
|||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int counter_is_active(unsigned long pmcr, int idx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long mask = 0;
|
||||
if (idx == ARMV6_CYCLE_COUNTER)
|
||||
mask = ARMV6_PMCR_CCOUNT_IEN;
|
||||
else if (idx == ARMV6_COUNTER0)
|
||||
mask = ARMV6_PMCR_COUNT0_IEN;
|
||||
else if (idx == ARMV6_COUNTER1)
|
||||
mask = ARMV6_PMCR_COUNT1_IEN;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mask)
|
||||
return pmcr & mask;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(1, "invalid counter number (%d)\n", idx);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static irqreturn_t
|
||||
armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num,
|
||||
void *dev)
|
||||
|
@ -513,7 +496,8 @@ armv6pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num,
|
|||
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
|
||||
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!counter_is_active(pmcr, idx))
|
||||
/* Ignore if we don't have an event. */
|
||||
if (!event)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -960,6 +960,10 @@ static irqreturn_t armv7pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
|
|||
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
|
||||
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Ignore if we don't have an event. */
|
||||
if (!event)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We have a single interrupt for all counters. Check that
|
||||
* each counter has overflowed before we process it.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ xscale1pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
|
|||
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
|
||||
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!event)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!xscale1_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(pmnc, idx))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -592,6 +595,9 @@ xscale2pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
|
|||
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
|
||||
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!event)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!xscale2_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(pmnc, idx))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue