docproc: cleanup brace placement
The placement of the opening brace "{" after 'if' statements in scripts/docproc.c is inconsistent. Most are placed on the same line as the 'if' statement itself as per CodingStyle, but a few are not. This patch cleans up the inconsistency. We save a few source lines and the file then uses the same style throughout, which is nice. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1c5454eed8
commit
f0f3ca8d96
1 changed files with 5 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -205,8 +205,7 @@ static void find_export_symbols(char * filename)
|
|||
PATH_MAX - strlen(real_filename));
|
||||
sym = add_new_file(filename);
|
||||
fp = fopen(real_filename, "r");
|
||||
if (fp == NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (fp == NULL) {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, "docproc: ");
|
||||
perror(real_filename);
|
||||
exit(1);
|
||||
|
@ -487,8 +486,7 @@ static void parse_file(FILE *infile)
|
|||
default:
|
||||
defaultline(line);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
defaultline(line);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -519,8 +517,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
|||
exit(2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (strcmp("doc", argv[1]) == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (strcmp("doc", argv[1]) == 0) {
|
||||
/* Need to do this in two passes.
|
||||
* First pass is used to collect all symbols exported
|
||||
* in the various files;
|
||||
|
@ -556,9 +553,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
|||
fprintf(stderr, "Warning: didn't use docs for %s\n",
|
||||
all_list[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (strcmp("depend", argv[1]) == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
} else if (strcmp("depend", argv[1]) == 0) {
|
||||
/* Create first part of dependency chain
|
||||
* file.tmpl */
|
||||
printf("%s\t", argv[2]);
|
||||
|
@ -571,9 +566,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
|||
findall = adddep;
|
||||
parse_file(infile);
|
||||
printf("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, "Unknown option: %s\n", argv[1]);
|
||||
exit(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue