nfsd: Reorder nfsd_cache_match to check more powerful discriminators first
We would normally expect the xid and the checksum to be the best discriminators. Check them before looking at the procedure number, etc. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
89a26b3d29
commit
ef9b16dc6d
1 changed files with 11 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -338,20 +338,24 @@ nfsd_cache_csum(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
|
|||
static bool
|
||||
nfsd_cache_match(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __wsum csum, struct svc_cacherep *rp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Check RPC header info first */
|
||||
if (rqstp->rq_xid != rp->c_xid || rqstp->rq_proc != rp->c_proc ||
|
||||
rqstp->rq_prot != rp->c_prot || rqstp->rq_vers != rp->c_vers ||
|
||||
rqstp->rq_arg.len != rp->c_len ||
|
||||
!rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) ||
|
||||
rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) != rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
|
||||
/* Check RPC XID first */
|
||||
if (rqstp->rq_xid != rp->c_xid)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* compare checksum of NFS data */
|
||||
if (csum != rp->c_csum) {
|
||||
++payload_misses;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Other discriminators */
|
||||
if (rqstp->rq_proc != rp->c_proc ||
|
||||
rqstp->rq_prot != rp->c_prot ||
|
||||
rqstp->rq_vers != rp->c_vers ||
|
||||
rqstp->rq_arg.len != rp->c_len ||
|
||||
!rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) ||
|
||||
rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) != rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue