From ef21d2431f32e9e74c65909f7f8c5e1a61ef608e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:36:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] afs: Fix some tracing details commit 4636cf184d6d9a92a56c2554681ea520dd4fe49a upstream. Fix a couple of tracelines to indicate the usage count after the atomic op, not the usage count before it to be consistent with other afs and rxrpc trace lines. Change the wording of the afs_call_trace_work trace ID label from "WORK" to "QUEUE" to reflect the fact that it's queueing work, not doing work. Fixes: 341f741f04be ("afs: Refcount the afs_call struct") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/afs/rxrpc.c | 4 ++-- include/trace/events/afs.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c index 560dd5ff5a15..5d6d4f9f092a 100644 --- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c +++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ void afs_put_call(struct afs_call *call) int n = atomic_dec_return(&call->usage); int o = atomic_read(&net->nr_outstanding_calls); - trace_afs_call(call, afs_call_trace_put, n + 1, o, + trace_afs_call(call, afs_call_trace_put, n, o, __builtin_return_address(0)); ASSERTCMP(n, >=, 0); @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static void afs_wake_up_async_call(struct sock *sk, struct rxrpc_call *rxcall, u = atomic_fetch_add_unless(&call->usage, 1, 0); if (u != 0) { - trace_afs_call(call, afs_call_trace_wake, u, + trace_afs_call(call, afs_call_trace_wake, u + 1, atomic_read(&call->net->nr_outstanding_calls), __builtin_return_address(0)); diff --git a/include/trace/events/afs.h b/include/trace/events/afs.h index d0a341bc4540..5bc2e30c0d75 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/afs.h +++ b/include/trace/events/afs.h @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ enum afs_edit_dir_reason { EM(afs_call_trace_free, "FREE ") \ EM(afs_call_trace_put, "PUT ") \ EM(afs_call_trace_wake, "WAKE ") \ - E_(afs_call_trace_work, "WORK ") + E_(afs_call_trace_work, "QUEUE") #define afs_fs_operations \ EM(afs_FS_FetchData, "FS.FetchData") \