Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

fuse: abort: no fc->lock needed for request ending

Browse source 
In fuse_abort_conn() when all requests are on private lists we no longer
need fc->lock protection.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Miklos Szeredi 2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
parent 46c34a348b
commit ee314a870e
1 changed files with 5 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
fs/fuse/dev.c
View file

@ -2072,8 +2072,6 @@ static unsigned fuse_dev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
* This function releases and reacquires fc->lock
*/
static void end_requests(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct list_head *head)
__releases(fc->lock)
__acquires(fc->lock)
{
while (!list_empty(head)) {
struct fuse_req *req;
@ -2082,9 +2080,7 @@ __acquires(fc->lock)
clear_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
list_del_init(&req->list);
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
request_end(fc, req);
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
}
}
@ -2160,20 +2156,20 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
wake_up_all_locked(&fiq->waitq);
spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
end_polls(fc);
wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
while (!list_empty(&to_end1)) {
req = list_first_entry(&to_end1, struct fuse_req, list);
__fuse_get_request(req);
list_del_init(&req->list);
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
request_end(fc, req);
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
}
end_requests(fc, &to_end2);
end_polls(fc);
wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
} else {
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
}
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_abort_conn);