Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

[IPSEC]: Use the top IPv4 route's peer instead of the bottom

Browse source 
For IPv4 we were using the bottom route's peer instead of the top one.
This is wrong because the peer is only used by TCP to keep track of
information about the TCP destination address which certainly does not
live in the bottom route.

This patch fixes that which allows us to get rid of the family check
since the bottom route could be IPv6 while the top one must always
be IPv4.

I've also changed the other fields which are IPv4-specific to get the
info from the top route instead of potentially bogus data from the
bottom route.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Herbert Xu 2007-10-17 21:34:46 -07:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 17c2a42a24
commit ed3e37ddb0
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
View file

@ -169,16 +169,16 @@ __xfrm4_bundle_create(struct xfrm_policy *policy, struct xfrm_state **xfrm, int
dst_prev->neighbour = neigh_clone(rt->u.dst.neighbour);
dst_prev->input = rt->u.dst.input;
dst_prev->output = dst_prev->xfrm->mode->afinfo->output;
if (dst_prev->xfrm->props.family == AF_INET && rt->peer)
atomic_inc(&rt->peer->refcnt);
x->u.rt.peer = rt->peer;
if (rt0->peer)
atomic_inc(&rt0->peer->refcnt);
x->u.rt.peer = rt0->peer;
/* Sheit... I remember I did this right. Apparently,
* it was magically lost, so this code needs audit */
x->u.rt.rt_flags = rt0->rt_flags&(RTCF_BROADCAST|RTCF_MULTICAST|RTCF_LOCAL);
x->u.rt.rt_type = rt->rt_type;
x->u.rt.rt_type = rt0->rt_type;
x->u.rt.rt_src = rt0->rt_src;
x->u.rt.rt_dst = rt0->rt_dst;
x->u.rt.rt_gateway = rt->rt_gateway;
x->u.rt.rt_gateway = rt0->rt_gateway;
x->u.rt.rt_spec_dst = rt0->rt_spec_dst;
x->u.rt.idev = rt0->idev;
in_dev_hold(rt0->idev);
@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void xfrm4_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
if (likely(xdst->u.rt.idev))
in_dev_put(xdst->u.rt.idev);
if (dst->xfrm && dst->xfrm->props.family == AF_INET && likely(xdst->u.rt.peer))
if (likely(xdst->u.rt.peer))
inet_putpeer(xdst->u.rt.peer);
xfrm_dst_destroy(xdst);
}