bonding: procfs: clean bond->lock usage and use RCU
Use RCU to protect against slave release, the proc show function will sync with the bond destruction by the proc locks and the fact that the bond is released after NETDEV_UNREGISTER which causes the bonding to remove the proc entry. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
059b47e8aa
commit
e9fe8efeea
1 changed files with 3 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -7,21 +7,18 @@
|
|||
|
||||
static void *bond_info_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
|
||||
__acquires(RCU)
|
||||
__acquires(&bond->lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bonding *bond = seq->private;
|
||||
struct list_head *iter;
|
||||
struct slave *slave;
|
||||
loff_t off = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* make sure the bond won't be taken away */
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
read_lock(&bond->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (*pos == 0)
|
||||
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
|
||||
|
||||
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
|
||||
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter)
|
||||
if (++off == *pos)
|
||||
return slave;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -37,12 +34,9 @@ static void *bond_info_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
|
|||
|
||||
++*pos;
|
||||
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
|
||||
return bond_first_slave(bond);
|
||||
return bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
|
||||
|
||||
if (bond_is_last_slave(bond, v))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
|
||||
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
|
||||
if (found)
|
||||
return slave;
|
||||
if (slave == v)
|
||||
|
@ -53,12 +47,8 @@ static void *bond_info_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void bond_info_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
|
||||
__releases(&bond->lock)
|
||||
__releases(RCU)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bonding *bond = seq->private;
|
||||
|
||||
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue