Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

sched: fix typo in the FAIR_GROUP_SCHED branch

Browse source 
while there's no in-tree way to turn group scheduling at the moment,
fix a typo in it nevertheless.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Ingo Molnar 2007-08-10 23:05:11 +02:00
parent 529c77261b
commit e56f31aad9
1 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
kernel/sched_fair.c
View file

@ -959,13 +959,12 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(busiest, busy_cfs_rq) { for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(busiest, busy_cfs_rq) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
struct cfs_rq *this_cfs_rq; struct cfs_rq *this_cfs_rq;
long imbalances; long imbalance;
unsigned long maxload; unsigned long maxload;
this_cfs_rq = cpu_cfs_rq(busy_cfs_rq, this_cpu); this_cfs_rq = cpu_cfs_rq(busy_cfs_rq, this_cpu);
imbalance = busy_cfs_rq->load.weight - imbalance = busy_cfs_rq->load.weight - this_cfs_rq->load.weight;
this_cfs_rq->load.weight;
/* Don't pull if this_cfs_rq has more load than busy_cfs_rq */ /* Don't pull if this_cfs_rq has more load than busy_cfs_rq */
if (imbalance <= 0) if (imbalance <= 0)
continue; continue;
@ -976,7 +975,7 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
*this_best_prio = cfs_rq_best_prio(this_cfs_rq); *this_best_prio = cfs_rq_best_prio(this_cfs_rq);
#else #else
#define maxload rem_load_move # define maxload rem_load_move
#endif #endif
/* pass busy_cfs_rq argument into /* pass busy_cfs_rq argument into
* load_balance_[start|next]_fair iterators * load_balance_[start|next]_fair iterators