sched: Fix sign under-flows in wake_affine
While care is taken around the zero-point in effective_load to not exceed the instantaneous rq->weight, it's still possible (e.g. using wake_idx != 0) for (load + effective_load) to underflow. In this case the comparing the unsigned values can result in incorrect balanced decisions. Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <20110122044851.734245014@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6663050edd
commit
e37b6a7b27
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static inline unsigned long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu,
|
|||
|
||||
static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long this_load, load;
|
||||
s64 this_load, load;
|
||||
int idx, this_cpu, prev_cpu;
|
||||
unsigned long tl_per_task;
|
||||
struct task_group *tg;
|
||||
|
@ -1471,8 +1471,8 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
|
|||
* Otherwise check if either cpus are near enough in load to allow this
|
||||
* task to be woken on this_cpu.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (this_load) {
|
||||
unsigned long this_eff_load, prev_eff_load;
|
||||
if (this_load > 0) {
|
||||
s64 this_eff_load, prev_eff_load;
|
||||
|
||||
this_eff_load = 100;
|
||||
this_eff_load *= power_of(prev_cpu);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue