[NET_SCHED] protect action config/dump from irqs
(with no apologies to C Heston) On Mon, 2007-10-09 at 21:00 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:11:29PM +0000, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > > after upgrading to 2.6.23-rc5 (and applying davem's fix [0]), lockdep > > was quite noisy when I tried to shape my external (wireless) interface: > > > > [ 6400.534545] FahCore_78.exe/3552 just changed the state of lock: > > [ 6400.534713] (&dev->ingress_lock){-+..}, at: [<c038d595>] > > netif_receive_skb+0x2d5/0x3c0 > > [ 6400.534941] but this lock took another, soft-read-irq-unsafe lock in the > > past: > > [ 6400.535145] (police_lock){-.--} > > This is a genuine dead-lock. The police lock can be taken > for reading with softirqs on. If a second CPU tries to take > the police lock for writing, while holding the ingress lock, > then a softirq on the first CPU can dead-lock when it tries > to get the ingress lock. Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4878809f71
commit
e1e992e52f
2 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
|
|||
int err = 0, index = -1,i = 0, s_i = 0, n_i = 0;
|
||||
struct rtattr *r ;
|
||||
|
||||
read_lock(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
read_lock_bh(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
s_i = cb->args[0];
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
done:
|
||||
read_unlock(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
read_unlock_bh(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
if (n_i)
|
||||
cb->args[0] += n_i;
|
||||
return n_i;
|
||||
|
@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ struct tcf_common *tcf_hash_lookup(u32 index, struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct tcf_common *p;
|
||||
|
||||
read_lock(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
read_lock_bh(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
for (p = hinfo->htab[tcf_hash(index, hinfo->hmask)]; p;
|
||||
p = p->tcfc_next) {
|
||||
if (p->tcfc_index == index)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
read_unlock(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
read_unlock_bh(hinfo->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return p;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *c
|
|||
int err = 0, index = -1, i = 0, s_i = 0, n_i = 0;
|
||||
struct rtattr *r;
|
||||
|
||||
read_lock(&police_lock);
|
||||
read_lock_bh(&police_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
s_i = cb->args[0];
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *c
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
done:
|
||||
read_unlock(&police_lock);
|
||||
read_unlock_bh(&police_lock);
|
||||
if (n_i)
|
||||
cb->args[0] += n_i;
|
||||
return n_i;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue