Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

sched: fix the theoretical signal_wake_up() vs schedule() race

Browse source 
This is only theoretical, but after try_to_wake_up(p) was changed
to check p->state under p->pi_lock the code like

	__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
	schedule();

can miss a signal. This is the special case of wait-for-condition,
it relies on try_to_wake_up/schedule interaction and thus it does
not need mb() between __set_current_state() and if(signal_pending).

However, this __set_current_state() can move into the critical
section protected by rq->lock, now that try_to_wake_up() takes
another lock we need to ensure that it can't be reordered with
"if (signal_pending(current))" check inside that section.

The patch is actually one-liner, it simply adds smp_wmb() before
spin_lock_irq(rq->lock). This is what try_to_wake_up() already
does by the same reason.

We turn this wmb() into the new helper, smp_mb__before_spinlock(),
for better documentation and to allow the architectures to change
the default implementation.

While at it, kill smp_mb__after_lock(), it has no callers.

Perhaps we can also add smp_mb__before/after_spinunlock() for
prepare_to_wait().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Oleg Nesterov 2013-08-12 18:14:00 +02:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 584d88b2cd
commit e0acd0a68e
3 changed files with 24 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
View file

@ -233,8 +233,4 @@ static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
#define arch_read_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
#define arch_write_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
/* The {read|write|spin}_lock() on x86 are full memory barriers. */
static inline void smp_mb__after_lock(void) { }
#define ARCH_HAS_SMP_MB_AFTER_LOCK
#endif /* _ASM_X86_SPINLOCK_H */

14
include/linux/spinlock.h
View file

@ -117,9 +117,17 @@ do { \
#endif /*arch_spin_is_contended*/
#endif
/* The lock does not imply full memory barrier. */
#ifndef ARCH_HAS_SMP_MB_AFTER_LOCK
static inline void smp_mb__after_lock(void) { smp_mb(); }
/*
* Despite its name it doesn't necessarily has to be a full barrier.
* It should only guarantee that a STORE before the critical section
* can not be reordered with a LOAD inside this section.
* spin_lock() is the one-way barrier, this LOAD can not escape out
* of the region. So the default implementation simply ensures that
* a STORE can not move into the critical section, smp_wmb() should
* serialize it with another STORE done by spin_lock().
*/
#ifndef smp_mb__before_spinlock
#define smp_mb__before_spinlock() smp_wmb()
#endif
/**

14
kernel/sched/core.c
View file

@ -1491,7 +1491,13 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
unsigned long flags;
int cpu, success = 0;
smp_wmb();
/*
* If we are going to wake up a thread waiting for CONDITION we
* need to ensure that CONDITION=1 done by the caller can not be
* reordered with p->state check below. This pairs with mb() in
* set_current_state() the waiting thread does.
*/
smp_mb__before_spinlock();
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
if (!(p->state & state))
goto out;
@ -2394,6 +2400,12 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
if (sched_feat(HRTICK))
hrtick_clear(rq);
/*
* Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
* can't be reordered with __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
* done by the caller to avoid the race with signal_wake_up().
*/
smp_mb__before_spinlock();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;