Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

RDS: make sure rds_send_drop_to properly takes the m_rs_lock

Browse source 
rds_send_drop_to() is used during socket tear down to find all the
messages on the socket and flush them .  It can race with the
acking code unless it takes the m_rs_lock on each and every message.

This plugs a hole where we didn't take m_rs_lock on any message that
didn't have the RDS_MSG_ON_CONN set.  Taking m_rs_lock avoids
double frees and other memory corruptions as the ack code trusts
the message m_rs pointer on a socket that had actually been freed.

We must take m_rs_lock to access m_rs.  Because of lock nesting and
rs access, we also need to acquire rs_lock.

Reviewed-by: Ajaykumar Hotchandani <ajaykumar.hotchandani@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com 2015-08-22 15:45:33 -07:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 1c3be624f4
commit dfcec251d2
1 changed files with 15 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
net/rds/send.c
View file

@ -778,8 +778,22 @@ void rds_send_drop_to(struct rds_sock *rs, struct sockaddr_in *dest)
while (!list_empty(&list)) {
rm = list_entry(list.next, struct rds_message, m_sock_item);
list_del_init(&rm->m_sock_item);
rds_message_wait(rm);
/* just in case the code above skipped this message
* because RDS_MSG_ON_CONN wasn't set, run it again here
* taking m_rs_lock is the only thing that keeps us
* from racing with ack processing.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&rm->m_rs_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&rs->rs_lock);
__rds_send_complete(rs, rm, RDS_RDMA_CANCELED);
spin_unlock(&rs->rs_lock);
rm->m_rs = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rm->m_rs_lock, flags);
rds_message_put(rm);
}
}