lib: lz4: cleanup unaligned access efficiency detection
These identifiers are bogus. The interested architectures should define HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS whenever relevant to do so. If this isn't true for some arch, it should be fixed in the arch definition. Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e26a691fe
commit
dea5c24a14
1 changed files with 1 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
|
||||||
typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S;
|
typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S;
|
||||||
typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S;
|
typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S;
|
||||||
typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S;
|
typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S;
|
||||||
#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) \
|
#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
|
||||||
|| defined(CONFIG_ARM) && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 \
|
|
||||||
&& defined(ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v)
|
#define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v)
|
||||||
#define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v)
|
#define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue