anon_vma_prepare: properly lock even newly allocated entries
The anon_vma code is very subtle, and we end up doing optimistic lookups of anon_vmas under RCU in page_lock_anon_vma() with no locking. Other CPU's can also see the newly allocated entry immediately after we've exposed it by setting "vma->anon_vma" to the new value. We protect against the anon_vma being destroyed by having the SLAB marked as SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, so the RCU lookup can depend on the allocation not being destroyed - but it might still be free'd and re-allocated here to a new vma. As a result, we should not do the anon_vma list ops on a newly allocated vma without proper locking. Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0cfd81031a
commit
d9d332e087
1 changed files with 32 additions and 10 deletions
42
mm/rmap.c
42
mm/rmap.c
|
@ -55,7 +55,33 @@
|
|||
|
||||
struct kmem_cache *anon_vma_cachep;
|
||||
|
||||
/* This must be called under the mmap_sem. */
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* anon_vma_prepare - attach an anon_vma to a memory region
|
||||
* @vma: the memory region in question
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This makes sure the memory mapping described by 'vma' has
|
||||
* an 'anon_vma' attached to it, so that we can associate the
|
||||
* anonymous pages mapped into it with that anon_vma.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The common case will be that we already have one, but if
|
||||
* if not we either need to find an adjacent mapping that we
|
||||
* can re-use the anon_vma from (very common when the only
|
||||
* reason for splitting a vma has been mprotect()), or we
|
||||
* allocate a new one.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Anon-vma allocations are very subtle, because we may have
|
||||
* optimistically looked up an anon_vma in page_lock_anon_vma()
|
||||
* and that may actually touch the spinlock even in the newly
|
||||
* allocated vma (it depends on RCU to make sure that the
|
||||
* anon_vma isn't actually destroyed).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* As a result, we need to do proper anon_vma locking even
|
||||
* for the new allocation. At the same time, we do not want
|
||||
* to do any locking for the common case of already having
|
||||
* an anon_vma.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This must be called with the mmap_sem held for reading.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = vma->anon_vma;
|
||||
|
@ -63,20 +89,17 @@ int anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
|||
might_sleep();
|
||||
if (unlikely(!anon_vma)) {
|
||||
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
|
||||
struct anon_vma *allocated, *locked;
|
||||
struct anon_vma *allocated;
|
||||
|
||||
anon_vma = find_mergeable_anon_vma(vma);
|
||||
if (anon_vma) {
|
||||
allocated = NULL;
|
||||
locked = anon_vma;
|
||||
spin_lock(&locked->lock);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
allocated = NULL;
|
||||
if (!anon_vma) {
|
||||
anon_vma = anon_vma_alloc();
|
||||
if (unlikely(!anon_vma))
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
allocated = anon_vma;
|
||||
locked = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_lock(&anon_vma->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* page_table_lock to protect against threads */
|
||||
spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
||||
|
@ -87,8 +110,7 @@ int anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
|||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (locked)
|
||||
spin_unlock(&locked->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&anon_vma->lock);
|
||||
if (unlikely(allocated))
|
||||
anon_vma_free(allocated);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue