regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning
A recursive lockdep warning occurs if you call regulator_set_optimum_mode() on a regulator with a supply because there is no nesting annotation for the rdev->mutex. To avoid this warning, get the supply's load before locking the regulator's mutex to avoid grabbing the same class of lock twice. ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.4.0 #3257 Tainted: G W --------------------------------------------- swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036e9e0>] regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38 but task is already holding lock: (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&rdev->mutex); lock(&rdev->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb48>] __driver_attach+0x40/0x8c #1: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb58>] __driver_attach+0x50/0x8c #2: (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224 stack backtrace: [<c001521c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x12c) from [<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080) [<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080) from [<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10) [<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10) from [<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8) [<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8) from [<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4) [<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4) from [<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38) [<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38) from [<c036efb8>] (regulator_set_optimum_mode+0xa4/0x224) ... Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6887a4131d
commit
d92d95b6bf
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -2519,9 +2519,12 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct regulator *regulator, int uA_load)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
|
struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
|
||||||
struct regulator *consumer;
|
struct regulator *consumer;
|
||||||
int ret, output_uV, input_uV, total_uA_load = 0;
|
int ret, output_uV, input_uV = 0, total_uA_load = 0;
|
||||||
unsigned int mode;
|
unsigned int mode;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (rdev->supply)
|
||||||
|
input_uV = regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
|
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
|
@ -2554,10 +2557,7 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct regulator *regulator, int uA_load)
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* get input voltage */
|
/* No supply? Use constraint voltage */
|
||||||
input_uV = 0;
|
|
||||||
if (rdev->supply)
|
|
||||||
input_uV = regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply);
|
|
||||||
if (input_uV <= 0)
|
if (input_uV <= 0)
|
||||||
input_uV = rdev->constraints->input_uV;
|
input_uV = rdev->constraints->input_uV;
|
||||||
if (input_uV <= 0) {
|
if (input_uV <= 0) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue