regulator: Fix recursive mutex lockdep warning

A recursive lockdep warning occurs if you call
regulator_set_optimum_mode() on a regulator with a supply because
there is no nesting annotation for the rdev->mutex. To avoid this
warning, get the supply's load before locking the regulator's
mutex to avoid grabbing the same class of lock twice.

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.4.0 #3257 Tainted: G        W
---------------------------------------------
swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036e9e0>] regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38

but task is already holding lock:
 (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&rdev->mutex);
  lock(&rdev->mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
 #0:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb48>] __driver_attach+0x40/0x8c
 #1:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb58>] __driver_attach+0x50/0x8c
 #2:  (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224

stack backtrace:
[<c001521c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x12c) from [<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080)
[<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080) from [<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10)
[<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10) from [<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8)
[<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8) from [<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4)
[<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4) from [<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38)
[<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38) from [<c036efb8>] (regulator_set_optimum_mode+0xa4/0x224)
...

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stephen Boyd 2012-07-02 19:21:06 -07:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 6887a4131d
commit d92d95b6bf

View file

@ -2519,9 +2519,12 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct regulator *regulator, int uA_load)
{
struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
struct regulator *consumer;
int ret, output_uV, input_uV, total_uA_load = 0;
int ret, output_uV, input_uV = 0, total_uA_load = 0;
unsigned int mode;
if (rdev->supply)
input_uV = regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply);
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
/*
@ -2554,10 +2557,7 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct regulator *regulator, int uA_load)
goto out;
}
/* get input voltage */
input_uV = 0;
if (rdev->supply)
input_uV = regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply);
/* No supply? Use constraint voltage */
if (input_uV <= 0)
input_uV = rdev->constraints->input_uV;
if (input_uV <= 0) {