ring-buffer: Remove duplicate use of '&' in recursive code
A clean up of the recursive protection code changed val = this_cpu_read(current_context); val--; val &= this_cpu_read(current_context); to val = this_cpu_read(current_context); val &= val & (val - 1); Which has a duplicate use of '&' as the above is the same as val = val & (val - 1); Actually, it would be best to remove that line altogether and just add it to where it is used. And Christoph even mentioned that it can be further compacted to just a single line: __this_cpu_and(current_context, __this_cpu_read(current_context) - 1); Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/alpine.DEB.2.11.1503271423580.23114@gentwo.org Suggested-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9a16d3ab8
commit
d631c8cceb
1 changed files with 1 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -2703,10 +2703,7 @@ static __always_inline int trace_recursive_lock(void)
|
|||
|
||||
static __always_inline void trace_recursive_unlock(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int val = __this_cpu_read(current_context);
|
||||
|
||||
val &= val & (val - 1);
|
||||
__this_cpu_write(current_context, val);
|
||||
__this_cpu_and(current_context, __this_cpu_read(current_context) - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue