ima: Directly assign the ima_default_policy pointer to ima_rules
commit 067a436b1b0aafa593344fddd711a755a58afb3b upstream.
This patch prevents the following oops:
[ 10.771813] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000
[...]
[ 10.779790] RIP: 0010:ima_match_policy+0xf7/0xb80
[...]
[ 10.798576] Call Trace:
[ 10.798993] ? ima_lsm_policy_change+0x2b0/0x2b0
[ 10.799753] ? inode_init_owner+0x1a0/0x1a0
[ 10.800484] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x7a/0xd0
[ 10.801592] ima_must_appraise.part.0+0xb6/0xf0
[ 10.802313] ? ima_fix_xattr.isra.0+0xd0/0xd0
[ 10.803167] ima_must_appraise+0x4f/0x70
[ 10.804004] ima_post_path_mknod+0x2e/0x80
[ 10.804800] do_mknodat+0x396/0x3c0
It occurs when there is a failure during IMA initialization, and
ima_init_policy() is not called. IMA hooks still call ima_match_policy()
but ima_rules is NULL. This patch prevents the crash by directly assigning
the ima_default_policy pointer to ima_rules when ima_rules is defined. This
wouldn't alter the existing behavior, as ima_rules is always set at the end
of ima_init_policy().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.7.x
Fixes: 07f6a79415
("ima: add appraise action keywords and default rules")
Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
71381daffe
commit
d52a190318
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
|
|||
static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules);
|
||||
static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules);
|
||||
static LIST_HEAD(ima_temp_rules);
|
||||
static struct list_head *ima_rules;
|
||||
static struct list_head *ima_rules = &ima_default_rules;
|
||||
|
||||
static int ima_policy __initdata;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
|
|||
temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ima_rules = &ima_default_rules;
|
||||
ima_update_policy_flag();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue