x86: Fix assert syntax in vmlinux.lds.S
Older versions of binutils did not accept the naked "ASSERT" syntax; it is considered an expression whose value needs to be assigned to something. Reported-tested-and-fixed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a7bbd57ed
commit
d2ba8b211b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ SECTIONS
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
|
||||
ASSERT((_end - LOAD_OFFSET <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
|
||||
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE")
|
||||
. = ASSERT((_end - LOAD_OFFSET <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
|
||||
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Per-cpu symbols which need to be offset from __per_cpu_load
|
||||
|
@ -407,12 +407,12 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_union);
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Build-time check on the image size:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ASSERT((_end - _text <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
|
||||
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE")
|
||||
. = ASSERT((_end - _text <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
|
||||
"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
|
||||
"irq_stack_union is not at start of per-cpu area");
|
||||
. = ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
|
||||
"irq_stack_union is not at start of per-cpu area");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
|
||||
|
@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
|
|||
#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
|
||||
#include <asm/kexec.h>
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(kexec_control_code_size <= KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE,
|
||||
"kexec control code size is too big")
|
||||
. = ASSERT(kexec_control_code_size <= KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE,
|
||||
"kexec control code size is too big");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue