From f21e0e81d81b649ad309cedc7226f1bed72982e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:12:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 01/23] regulator: Do bulk enables of regulators in parallel In order to reduce the impact of ramp times rather than enabling the regulators for a device in series use async tasks to run the actual enables. This means that the delays which the enables implement can all run in parallel, though it does mean that the order in which the supplies come on may be unstable. For super bonus fun points if any of the regulators are shared between multiple supplies on the same device (as is rather likely) then this will test our locking. Note that in this case we only delay once for each physical regulator so the threads shouldn't block each other while delaying. It'd be even nicer if we could coalesce writes to a shared enable registers in PMICs but that's definitely future work, and it may also be useful and is certainly more achievable to optimise out the parallelism if none of the regulators implement ramp delays. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index d3e38790906e..7b38af90a012 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -2264,6 +2265,13 @@ int regulator_bulk_get(struct device *dev, int num_consumers, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_bulk_get); +static void regulator_bulk_enable_async(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie) +{ + struct regulator_bulk_data *bulk = data; + + bulk->ret = regulator_enable(bulk->consumer); +} + /** * regulator_bulk_enable - enable multiple regulator consumers * @@ -2279,21 +2287,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_bulk_get); int regulator_bulk_enable(int num_consumers, struct regulator_bulk_data *consumers) { + LIST_HEAD(async_domain); int i; - int ret; + int ret = 0; + for (i = 0; i < num_consumers; i++) + async_schedule_domain(regulator_bulk_enable_async, + &consumers[i], &async_domain); + + async_synchronize_full_domain(&async_domain); + + /* If any consumer failed we need to unwind any that succeeded */ for (i = 0; i < num_consumers; i++) { - ret = regulator_enable(consumers[i].consumer); - if (ret != 0) + if (consumers[i].ret != 0) { + ret = consumers[i].ret; goto err; + } } return 0; err: - pr_err("Failed to enable %s: %d\n", consumers[i].supply, ret); - for (--i; i >= 0; --i) - regulator_disable(consumers[i].consumer); + for (i = 0; i < num_consumers; i++) + if (consumers[i].ret == 0) + regulator_disable(consumers[i].consumer); + else + pr_err("Failed to enable %s: %d\n", + consumers[i].supply, consumers[i].ret); return ret; } diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h index 9e87c1cb7270..26f6ea4444e3 100644 --- a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h +++ b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h @@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ struct regulator; struct regulator_bulk_data { const char *supply; struct regulator *consumer; + + /* Internal use */ + int ret; }; #if defined(CONFIG_REGULATOR) From 2ae3636b79aee1a69b2e84eff68bb123090796d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:14:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 02/23] regulator: Use _cansleep() for WM8994 regulator GPIOs The WM8994 regulator driver is perfectly happy if the GPIO used to enable the regulator sleeps so call the appropriate GPIO API. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c index 35b2958d5106..1a6a690f24db 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static int wm8994_ldo_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (!ldo->enable) return 0; - gpio_set_value(ldo->enable, 1); + gpio_set_value_cansleep(ldo->enable, 1); ldo->is_enabled = true; return 0; @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static int wm8994_ldo_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (!ldo->enable) return -EINVAL; - gpio_set_value(ldo->enable, 0); + gpio_set_value_cansleep(ldo->enable, 0); ldo->is_enabled = false; return 0; From 7736f11dbadce33d3f12bf0e8114d0f1da5e8622 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Cross Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 12:25:27 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 03/23] regulator: twl-regulator: fix n_voltages for twl6030 variable LDOs The n_voltages initializer for the TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO macro is off by one, causing the the highest supported voltage to be unreachable. Setting the machine constraints to only allow the highest voltage causes errors: machine_constraints_voltage: VAUX3_6030: unsupportable voltage constraints twl_reg twl_reg.39: can't register VAUX3_6030, -22 twl_reg: probe of twl_reg.39 failed with error -22 This patch fixes the off by one error. Tested by setting VAUX3_6030 to 3.3V. Signed-off-by: Colin Cross Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c index 87fe0f75a56e..503c2bc64c84 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops twlsmps_ops = { .desc = { \ .name = #label, \ .id = TWL6030_REG_##label, \ - .n_voltages = (max_mVolts - min_mVolts)/100, \ + .n_voltages = (max_mVolts - min_mVolts)/100 + 1, \ .ops = &twl6030ldo_ops, \ .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \ .owner = THIS_MODULE, \ From c08957a2cf3c4a14e68d72c845d3c52cf3d826e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:36:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 04/23] regulator: Properly register dummy regulator driver Recent changes in the driver core appear to mean that the data structures for the driver core are not fully initialised unless the driver is bound. Make sure the driver core knows the dummy driver is in use by binding it to a driver. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/dummy.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/dummy.c b/drivers/regulator/dummy.c index c7410bde7b5d..f6ef6694ab98 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/dummy.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/dummy.c @@ -36,6 +36,29 @@ static struct regulator_desc dummy_desc = { .ops = &dummy_ops, }; +static int __devinit dummy_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + int ret; + + dummy_regulator_rdev = regulator_register(&dummy_desc, NULL, + &dummy_initdata, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(dummy_regulator_rdev)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(dummy_regulator_rdev); + pr_err("Failed to register regulator: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + +static struct platform_driver dummy_regulator_driver = { + .probe = dummy_regulator_probe, + .driver = { + .name = "reg-dummy", + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + }, +}; + static struct platform_device *dummy_pdev; void __init regulator_dummy_init(void) @@ -55,12 +78,9 @@ void __init regulator_dummy_init(void) return; } - dummy_regulator_rdev = regulator_register(&dummy_desc, NULL, - &dummy_initdata, NULL); - if (IS_ERR(dummy_regulator_rdev)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(dummy_regulator_rdev); - pr_err("Failed to register regulator: %d\n", ret); + ret = platform_driver_register(&dummy_regulator_driver); + if (ret != 0) { + pr_err("Failed to register dummy regulator driver: %d\n", ret); platform_device_unregister(dummy_pdev); - return; } } From f5726ae33c382366ea1b23240d5620dcf675d81d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:22:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 05/23] regulator: Increase the limit on sysfs file names With verbose filenames we can easily hit 32 characters. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 7b38af90a012..75312bd6aac4 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static void unset_regulator_supplies(struct regulator_dev *rdev) } } -#define REG_STR_SIZE 32 +#define REG_STR_SIZE 64 static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev, struct device *dev, From e0eaedefda8e14ed3f445f382c568c5d69e4223f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:22:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 06/23] regulator: Include the device name in the microamps_requested_ file We may have multiple devices requesting a supply with the same name so include the device name in the generated filename for microamps_requested to avoid duplicate files. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 75312bd6aac4..e3b67ee48b23 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -1053,8 +1053,9 @@ static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev, if (dev) { /* create a 'requested_microamps_name' sysfs entry */ - size = scnprintf(buf, REG_STR_SIZE, "microamps_requested_%s", - supply_name); + size = scnprintf(buf, REG_STR_SIZE, + "microamps_requested_%s-%s", + dev_name(dev), supply_name); if (size >= REG_STR_SIZE) goto overflow_err; From 3801b86aa482d26a8ae460f67fca29e016491a86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:22:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 07/23] regulator: Refactor supply implementation to work as regular consumers Currently the regulator supply implementation is somewhat complex and fragile as it doesn't look like standard consumers but is instead a parallel implementation. This causes issues with locking and reference counting. Move the implementation over to using standard consumers to address this. Rather than only notifying the supply on the first enable/disable we do so every time the regulator is enabled or disabled, simplifying locking as we don't need to hold a lock on the consumer we are about to enable. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 101 +++++++++++-------------------- include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 4 +- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index e3b67ee48b23..f0cc3983ffee 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -82,8 +82,7 @@ struct regulator { }; static int _regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev); -static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, - struct regulator_dev **supply_rdev_ptr); +static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev); static int _regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev); static int _regulator_get_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev); static unsigned int _regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev); @@ -91,6 +90,9 @@ static void _notifier_call_chain(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned long event, void *data); static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV); +static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev, + struct device *dev, + const char *supply_name); static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev *rdev) { @@ -930,21 +932,20 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev, * core if it's child is enabled. */ static int set_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev, - struct regulator_dev *supply_rdev) + struct regulator_dev *supply_rdev) { int err; - err = sysfs_create_link(&rdev->dev.kobj, &supply_rdev->dev.kobj, - "supply"); - if (err) { - rdev_err(rdev, "could not add device link %s err %d\n", - supply_rdev->dev.kobj.name, err); - goto out; + rdev_info(rdev, "supplied by %s\n", rdev_get_name(supply_rdev)); + + rdev->supply = create_regulator(supply_rdev, &rdev->dev, "SUPPLY"); + if (IS_ERR(rdev->supply)) { + err = PTR_ERR(rdev->supply); + rdev->supply = NULL; + return err; } - rdev->supply = supply_rdev; - list_add(&rdev->slist, &supply_rdev->supply_list); -out: - return err; + + return 0; } /** @@ -1303,19 +1304,6 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev) { int ret, delay; - if (rdev->use_count == 0) { - /* do we need to enable the supply regulator first */ - if (rdev->supply) { - mutex_lock(&rdev->supply->mutex); - ret = _regulator_enable(rdev->supply); - mutex_unlock(&rdev->supply->mutex); - if (ret < 0) { - rdev_err(rdev, "failed to enable: %d\n", ret); - return ret; - } - } - } - /* check voltage and requested load before enabling */ if (rdev->constraints && (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS)) @@ -1390,19 +1378,27 @@ int regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator) struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev; int ret = 0; + if (rdev->supply) { + ret = regulator_enable(rdev->supply); + if (ret != 0) + return ret; + } + mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex); ret = _regulator_enable(rdev); mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex); + + if (ret != 0) + regulator_disable(rdev->supply); + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_enable); /* locks held by regulator_disable() */ -static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, - struct regulator_dev **supply_rdev_ptr) +static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev) { int ret = 0; - *supply_rdev_ptr = NULL; if (WARN(rdev->use_count <= 0, "unbalanced disables for %s\n", rdev_get_name(rdev))) @@ -1429,9 +1425,6 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, NULL); } - /* decrease our supplies ref count and disable if required */ - *supply_rdev_ptr = rdev->supply; - rdev->use_count = 0; } else if (rdev->use_count > 1) { @@ -1442,6 +1435,7 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, rdev->use_count--; } + return ret; } @@ -1460,29 +1454,21 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int regulator_disable(struct regulator *regulator) { struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev; - struct regulator_dev *supply_rdev = NULL; int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex); - ret = _regulator_disable(rdev, &supply_rdev); + ret = _regulator_disable(rdev); mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex); - /* decrease our supplies ref count and disable if required */ - while (supply_rdev != NULL) { - rdev = supply_rdev; - - mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex); - _regulator_disable(rdev, &supply_rdev); - mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex); - } + if (ret == 0 && rdev->supply) + regulator_disable(rdev->supply); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_disable); /* locks held by regulator_force_disable() */ -static int _regulator_force_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, - struct regulator_dev **supply_rdev_ptr) +static int _regulator_force_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev) { int ret = 0; @@ -1499,10 +1485,6 @@ static int _regulator_force_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE, NULL); } - /* decrease our supplies ref count and disable if required */ - *supply_rdev_ptr = rdev->supply; - - rdev->use_count = 0; return ret; } @@ -1518,16 +1500,16 @@ static int _regulator_force_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int regulator_force_disable(struct regulator *regulator) { struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev; - struct regulator_dev *supply_rdev = NULL; int ret; mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex); regulator->uA_load = 0; - ret = _regulator_force_disable(rdev, &supply_rdev); + ret = _regulator_force_disable(regulator->rdev); mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex); - if (supply_rdev) - regulator_disable(get_device_regulator(rdev_get_dev(supply_rdev))); + if (rdev->supply) + while (rdev->open_count--) + regulator_disable(rdev->supply); return ret; } @@ -2138,7 +2120,7 @@ int regulator_set_optimum_mode(struct regulator *regulator, int uA_load) /* get input voltage */ input_uV = 0; if (rdev->supply) - input_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply); + input_uV = regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply); if (input_uV <= 0) input_uV = rdev->constraints->input_uV; if (input_uV <= 0) { @@ -2208,17 +2190,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_unregister_notifier); static void _notifier_call_chain(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned long event, void *data) { - struct regulator_dev *_rdev; - /* call rdev chain first */ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&rdev->notifier, event, NULL); - - /* now notify regulator we supply */ - list_for_each_entry(_rdev, &rdev->supply_list, slist) { - mutex_lock(&_rdev->mutex); - _notifier_call_chain(_rdev, event, data); - mutex_unlock(&_rdev->mutex); - } } /** @@ -2610,9 +2583,7 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc, rdev->owner = regulator_desc->owner; rdev->desc = regulator_desc; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->consumer_list); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->supply_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->list); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->slist); BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier); /* preform any regulator specific init */ @@ -2724,7 +2695,7 @@ void regulator_unregister(struct regulator_dev *rdev) unset_regulator_supplies(rdev); list_del(&rdev->list); if (rdev->supply) - sysfs_remove_link(&rdev->dev.kobj, "supply"); + regulator_put(rdev->supply); device_unregister(&rdev->dev); kfree(rdev->constraints); mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex); diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h index 6c433b89c80d..1a80bc77517d 100644 --- a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h +++ b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h @@ -188,18 +188,16 @@ struct regulator_dev { /* lists we belong to */ struct list_head list; /* list of all regulators */ - struct list_head slist; /* list of supplied regulators */ /* lists we own */ struct list_head consumer_list; /* consumers we supply */ - struct list_head supply_list; /* regulators we supply */ struct blocking_notifier_head notifier; struct mutex mutex; /* consumer lock */ struct module *owner; struct device dev; struct regulation_constraints *constraints; - struct regulator_dev *supply; /* for tree */ + struct regulator *supply; /* for tree */ void *reg_data; /* regulator_dev data */ From 7d51a0dbe51282f3ed13cadf6e7f13a974374be2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:06:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 08/23] regulator: Add rdev_crit() macro No actual users but provide the macro so there's less surprise when it's not there. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index f0cc3983ffee..cc3dfd66f395 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ #include "dummy.h" +#define rdev_crit(rdev, fmt, ...) \ + pr_crit("%s: " fmt, rdev_get_name(rdev), ##__VA_ARGS__) #define rdev_err(rdev, fmt, ...) \ pr_err("%s: " fmt, rdev_get_name(rdev), ##__VA_ARGS__) #define rdev_warn(rdev, fmt, ...) \ From 5de705194e9883a39f993e2ff96028d5aab99b37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:33:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 09/23] regulator: Add basic per consumer debugfs Report the requested load and voltage for each consumer in debugfs when it is enabled. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index cc3dfd66f395..f59821f10fdc 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ struct regulator { char *supply_name; struct device_attribute dev_attr; struct regulator_dev *rdev; +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS + struct dentry *debugfs; +#endif }; static int _regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev); @@ -1093,7 +1096,28 @@ static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev, dev->kobj.name, err); goto link_name_err; } + } else { + regulator->supply_name = kstrdup(supply_name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (regulator->supply_name == NULL) + goto attr_err; } + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS + regulator->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(regulator->supply_name, + rdev->debugfs); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(regulator->debugfs)) { + rdev_warn(rdev, "Failed to create debugfs directory\n"); + regulator->debugfs = NULL; + } else { + debugfs_create_u32("uA_load", 0444, regulator->debugfs, + ®ulator->uA_load); + debugfs_create_u32("min_uV", 0444, regulator->debugfs, + ®ulator->min_uV); + debugfs_create_u32("max_uV", 0444, regulator->debugfs, + ®ulator->max_uV); + } +#endif + mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex); return regulator; link_name_err: @@ -1272,13 +1296,17 @@ void regulator_put(struct regulator *regulator) mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex); rdev = regulator->rdev; +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS + debugfs_remove_recursive(regulator->debugfs); +#endif + /* remove any sysfs entries */ if (regulator->dev) { sysfs_remove_link(&rdev->dev.kobj, regulator->supply_name); - kfree(regulator->supply_name); device_remove_file(regulator->dev, ®ulator->dev_attr); kfree(regulator->dev_attr.attr.name); } + kfree(regulator->supply_name); list_del(®ulator->list); kfree(regulator); From 909c2f32ca0629678e353343d69089f4e94ea974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jarkko Nikula Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:37:02 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 10/23] ASoC: tlv320aic3x: Add correct hw registers to Line1 cross connect muxes Commit af46800 ("ASoC: Implement mux control sharing") revealed that "Left Line1[L | R] Mux" and "Right Line1[L | R] Mux" widgets were pointing to the same kcontrols and codec registers and thus soc-core falsely detected them as shared controls. This is actually wrong since there are separate registers in hardware that configure Line1L to RADC and Line1R to LADC cross connects so these muxes should not be shared. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c index c3d96fc8c267..6e35b5109c19 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c @@ -226,11 +226,13 @@ static const char *aic3x_adc_hpf[] = #define RDAC_ENUM 1 #define LHPCOM_ENUM 2 #define RHPCOM_ENUM 3 -#define LINE1L_ENUM 4 -#define LINE1R_ENUM 5 -#define LINE2L_ENUM 6 -#define LINE2R_ENUM 7 -#define ADC_HPF_ENUM 8 +#define LINE1L_2_L_ENUM 4 +#define LINE1L_2_R_ENUM 5 +#define LINE1R_2_L_ENUM 6 +#define LINE1R_2_R_ENUM 7 +#define LINE2L_ENUM 8 +#define LINE2R_ENUM 9 +#define ADC_HPF_ENUM 10 static const struct soc_enum aic3x_enum[] = { SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(DAC_LINE_MUX, 6, 3, aic3x_left_dac_mux), @@ -238,6 +240,8 @@ static const struct soc_enum aic3x_enum[] = { SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(HPLCOM_CFG, 4, 3, aic3x_left_hpcom_mux), SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(HPRCOM_CFG, 3, 5, aic3x_right_hpcom_mux), SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(LINE1L_2_LADC_CTRL, 7, 2, aic3x_linein_mode_mux), + SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(LINE1L_2_RADC_CTRL, 7, 2, aic3x_linein_mode_mux), + SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(LINE1R_2_LADC_CTRL, 7, 2, aic3x_linein_mode_mux), SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(LINE1R_2_RADC_CTRL, 7, 2, aic3x_linein_mode_mux), SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(LINE2L_2_LADC_CTRL, 7, 2, aic3x_linein_mode_mux), SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(LINE2R_2_RADC_CTRL, 7, 2, aic3x_linein_mode_mux), @@ -490,12 +494,16 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_right_pga_mixer_controls[] = { }; /* Left Line1 Mux */ -static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_left_line1_mux_controls = -SOC_DAPM_ENUM("Route", aic3x_enum[LINE1L_ENUM]); +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_left_line1l_mux_controls = +SOC_DAPM_ENUM("Route", aic3x_enum[LINE1L_2_L_ENUM]); +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_right_line1l_mux_controls = +SOC_DAPM_ENUM("Route", aic3x_enum[LINE1L_2_R_ENUM]); /* Right Line1 Mux */ -static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_right_line1_mux_controls = -SOC_DAPM_ENUM("Route", aic3x_enum[LINE1R_ENUM]); +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_right_line1r_mux_controls = +SOC_DAPM_ENUM("Route", aic3x_enum[LINE1R_2_R_ENUM]); +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_left_line1r_mux_controls = +SOC_DAPM_ENUM("Route", aic3x_enum[LINE1R_2_L_ENUM]); /* Left Line2 Mux */ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new aic3x_left_line2_mux_controls = @@ -535,9 +543,9 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget aic3x_dapm_widgets[] = { &aic3x_left_pga_mixer_controls[0], ARRAY_SIZE(aic3x_left_pga_mixer_controls)), SND_SOC_DAPM_MUX("Left Line1L Mux", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0, - &aic3x_left_line1_mux_controls), + &aic3x_left_line1l_mux_controls), SND_SOC_DAPM_MUX("Left Line1R Mux", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0, - &aic3x_left_line1_mux_controls), + &aic3x_left_line1r_mux_controls), SND_SOC_DAPM_MUX("Left Line2L Mux", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0, &aic3x_left_line2_mux_controls), @@ -548,9 +556,9 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget aic3x_dapm_widgets[] = { &aic3x_right_pga_mixer_controls[0], ARRAY_SIZE(aic3x_right_pga_mixer_controls)), SND_SOC_DAPM_MUX("Right Line1L Mux", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0, - &aic3x_right_line1_mux_controls), + &aic3x_right_line1l_mux_controls), SND_SOC_DAPM_MUX("Right Line1R Mux", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0, - &aic3x_right_line1_mux_controls), + &aic3x_right_line1r_mux_controls), SND_SOC_DAPM_MUX("Right Line2R Mux", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0, &aic3x_right_line2_mux_controls), From af8b244f733383656c8b4c0c6e94e210e7bbc596 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ambresh K Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 19:02:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 11/23] regulator: TWL: Remove entry of RES_ID for 6030 macros RES_ID is only used in 4030, to send PBM singular message to control the state of dedicated resources. In 6030, we don't have concept of PBM, hence removing the definition of RES_ID (num) from macros. Signed-off-by: Ambresh K Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 62 +++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c index 503c2bc64c84..ee8747f4fa08 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c @@ -835,8 +835,8 @@ static struct regulator_ops twlsmps_ops = { remap_conf) \ TWL_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, num, turnon_delay, \ remap_conf, TWL4030, twl4030fixed_ops) -#define TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, num, turnon_delay) \ - TWL_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, num, turnon_delay, \ +#define TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, turnon_delay) \ + TWL_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, 0x0, turnon_delay, \ 0x0, TWL6030, twl6030fixed_ops) #define TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, num, turnon_delay, remap_conf) { \ @@ -856,9 +856,8 @@ static struct regulator_ops twlsmps_ops = { }, \ } -#define TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, min_mVolts, max_mVolts, num) { \ +#define TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, min_mVolts, max_mVolts) { \ .base = offset, \ - .id = num, \ .min_mV = min_mVolts, \ .max_mV = max_mVolts, \ .desc = { \ @@ -871,9 +870,8 @@ static struct regulator_ops twlsmps_ops = { }, \ } -#define TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, min_mVolts, max_mVolts, num) { \ +#define TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, min_mVolts, max_mVolts) { \ .base = offset, \ - .id = num, \ .min_mV = min_mVolts, \ .max_mV = max_mVolts, \ .desc = { \ @@ -903,9 +901,8 @@ static struct regulator_ops twlsmps_ops = { }, \ } -#define TWL6030_FIXED_RESOURCE(label, offset, num, turnon_delay) { \ +#define TWL6030_FIXED_RESOURCE(label, offset, turnon_delay) { \ .base = offset, \ - .id = num, \ .delay = turnon_delay, \ .desc = { \ .name = #label, \ @@ -916,9 +913,8 @@ static struct regulator_ops twlsmps_ops = { }, \ } -#define TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(label, offset, num) { \ +#define TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(label, offset) { \ .base = offset, \ - .id = num, \ .min_mV = 600, \ .max_mV = 2100, \ .desc = { \ @@ -961,32 +957,32 @@ static struct twlreg_info twl_regs[] = { /* 6030 REG with base as PMC Slave Misc : 0x0030 */ /* Turnon-delay and remap configuration values for 6030 are not verified since the specification is not public */ - TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX1_6030, 0x54, 1000, 3300, 1), - TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX2_6030, 0x58, 1000, 3300, 2), - TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX3_6030, 0x5c, 1000, 3300, 3), - TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VMMC, 0x68, 1000, 3300, 4), - TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VPP, 0x6c, 1000, 3300, 5), - TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VUSIM, 0x74, 1000, 3300, 7), - TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VANA, 0x50, 2100, 15, 0), - TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VCXIO, 0x60, 1800, 16, 0), - TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VDAC, 0x64, 1800, 17, 0), - TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VUSB, 0x70, 3300, 18, 0), - TWL6030_FIXED_RESOURCE(CLK32KG, 0x8C, 48, 0), + TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX1_6030, 0x54, 1000, 3300), + TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX2_6030, 0x58, 1000, 3300), + TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX3_6030, 0x5c, 1000, 3300), + TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VMMC, 0x68, 1000, 3300), + TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VPP, 0x6c, 1000, 3300), + TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VUSIM, 0x74, 1000, 3300), + TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VANA, 0x50, 2100, 0), + TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VCXIO, 0x60, 1800, 0), + TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VDAC, 0x64, 1800, 0), + TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VUSB, 0x70, 3300, 0), + TWL6030_FIXED_RESOURCE(CLK32KG, 0x8C, 0), /* 6025 are renamed compared to 6030 versions */ - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO2, 0x54, 1000, 3300, 1), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO4, 0x58, 1000, 3300, 2), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO3, 0x5c, 1000, 3300, 3), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO5, 0x68, 1000, 3300, 4), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO1, 0x6c, 1000, 3300, 5), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO7, 0x74, 1000, 3300, 7), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO6, 0x60, 1000, 3300, 16), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDOLN, 0x64, 1000, 3300, 17), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDOUSB, 0x70, 1000, 3300, 18), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO2, 0x54, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO4, 0x58, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO3, 0x5c, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO5, 0x68, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO1, 0x6c, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO7, 0x74, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO6, 0x60, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDOLN, 0x64, 1000, 3300), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDOUSB, 0x70, 1000, 3300), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(SMPS3, 0x34, 1), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(SMPS4, 0x10, 2), - TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(VIO, 0x16, 3), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(SMPS3, 0x34), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(SMPS4, 0x10), + TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(VIO, 0x16), }; static u8 twl_get_smps_offset(void) From a3ee13ee77feea001597415f3a231a8bd4d3c6bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:52:07 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 12/23] regulator: tps65910: Fix a memory leak in tps65910_probe error path Fix a memory leak if chip id is not matched. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c index 55dd4e6650db..b07a66471fb7 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c @@ -903,6 +903,7 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) info = tps65911_regs; default: pr_err("Invalid tps chip version\n"); + kfree(pmic); return -ENODEV; } From d04156bca629740a661fd0738cd69ba1f08b2b20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:44:09 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 13/23] regulator: tps65910: Add missing breaks in switch/case Also add a default case in tps65910_list_voltage_dcdc to silence 'volt' may be used uninitialized in this function warning. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c index b07a66471fb7..8e0edab74786 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c @@ -759,8 +759,13 @@ static int tps65910_list_voltage_dcdc(struct regulator_dev *dev, mult = (selector / VDD1_2_NUM_VOLTS) + 1; volt = VDD1_2_MIN_VOLT + (selector % VDD1_2_NUM_VOLTS) * VDD1_2_OFFSET; + break; case TPS65911_REG_VDDCTRL: volt = VDDCTRL_MIN_VOLT + (selector * VDDCTRL_OFFSET); + break; + default: + BUG(); + return -EINVAL; } return volt * 100 * mult; @@ -898,9 +903,11 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) case TPS65910: pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65910_get_ctrl_register; info = tps65910_regs; + break; case TPS65911: pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65911_get_ctrl_register; info = tps65911_regs; + break; default: pr_err("Invalid tps chip version\n"); kfree(pmic); From 39aa9b6e3cb1b2a564d3422eedb7f725179162d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:57:43 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 14/23] regulator: tps65910: Fix array access out of bounds bug For tps65910, the number of regulator is 13. ( ARRAY_SIZE(tps65910_regs) is 13) For tps65911, the number of regulator is 12. ( ARRAY_SIZE(tps65911_regs) is 12) If we are using this driver for tps65911, we hit array access out of bounds bug in tps65910_probe() because current implementation always assume the number of regulator is 13 and thus it will access tps65911_regs[12]. Fix it by setting correct num_regulators for both chips in tps65910_probe(), and allocated neccessay memory accordingly. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c index 8e0edab74786..66d2d60b436a 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ #define TPS65911_REG_LDO7 11 #define TPS65911_REG_LDO8 12 -#define TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR 13 #define TPS65910_SUPPLY_STATE_ENABLED 0x1 /* supported VIO voltages in milivolts */ @@ -264,11 +263,12 @@ static struct tps_info tps65911_regs[] = { }; struct tps65910_reg { - struct regulator_desc desc[TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR]; + struct regulator_desc *desc; struct tps65910 *mfd; - struct regulator_dev *rdev[TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR]; - struct tps_info *info[TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR]; + struct regulator_dev **rdev; + struct tps_info **info; struct mutex mutex; + int num_regulators; int mode; int (*get_ctrl_reg)(int); }; @@ -902,10 +902,12 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) switch(tps65910_chip_id(tps65910)) { case TPS65910: pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65910_get_ctrl_register; + pmic->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65910_regs); info = tps65910_regs; break; case TPS65911: pmic->get_ctrl_reg = &tps65911_get_ctrl_register; + pmic->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65911_regs); info = tps65911_regs; break; default: @@ -914,7 +916,28 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENODEV; } - for (i = 0; i < TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR; i++, info++, reg_data++) { + pmic->desc = kcalloc(pmic->num_regulators, + sizeof(struct regulator_desc), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pmic->desc) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto err_free_pmic; + } + + pmic->info = kcalloc(pmic->num_regulators, + sizeof(struct tps_info *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pmic->info) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto err_free_desc; + } + + pmic->rdev = kcalloc(pmic->num_regulators, + sizeof(struct regulator_dev *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pmic->rdev) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto err_free_info; + } + + for (i = 0; i < pmic->num_regulators; i++, info++, reg_data++) { /* Register the regulators */ pmic->info[i] = info; @@ -946,7 +969,7 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) "failed to register %s regulator\n", pdev->name); err = PTR_ERR(rdev); - goto err; + goto err_unregister_regulator; } /* Save regulator for cleanup */ @@ -954,23 +977,31 @@ static __devinit int tps65910_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } return 0; -err: +err_unregister_regulator: while (--i >= 0) regulator_unregister(pmic->rdev[i]); - + kfree(pmic->rdev); +err_free_info: + kfree(pmic->info); +err_free_desc: + kfree(pmic->desc); +err_free_pmic: kfree(pmic); return err; } static int __devexit tps65910_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { - struct tps65910_reg *tps65910_reg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct tps65910_reg *pmic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); int i; - for (i = 0; i < TPS65910_NUM_REGULATOR; i++) - regulator_unregister(tps65910_reg->rdev[i]); + for (i = 0; i < pmic->num_regulators; i++) + regulator_unregister(pmic->rdev[i]); - kfree(tps65910_reg); + kfree(pmic->rdev); + kfree(pmic->info); + kfree(pmic->desc); + kfree(pmic); return 0; } From 89f425ed5bf3d4fd97e840296dccd75b8e0fe4c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:20:37 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 15/23] regulator: Make core more chatty about some errors Prevent some head scratching by making the core log about some rare but possible errors with invalid voltage ranges and modes being set. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index f59821f10fdc..3700d0953d73 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -151,8 +151,11 @@ static int regulator_check_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, if (*min_uV < rdev->constraints->min_uV) *min_uV = rdev->constraints->min_uV; - if (*min_uV > *max_uV) + if (*min_uV > *max_uV) { + rdev_err(rdev, "unsupportable voltage range: %d-%duV\n", + min_uV, max_uV); return -EINVAL; + } return 0; } @@ -205,8 +208,11 @@ static int regulator_check_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev, if (*min_uA < rdev->constraints->min_uA) *min_uA = rdev->constraints->min_uA; - if (*min_uA > *max_uA) + if (*min_uA > *max_uA) { + rdev_err(rdev, "unsupportable current range: %d-%duA\n", + min_uA, max_uA); return -EINVAL; + } return 0; } @@ -221,6 +227,7 @@ static int regulator_mode_constrain(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int *mode) case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY: break; default: + rdev_err(rdev, "invalid mode %x specified\n", *mode); return -EINVAL; } From 1a6958e79f9e191c89fe0c13f7452b0bd8097050 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:50:43 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 16/23] regulator: Fix memory leak in set_machine_constraints() error paths Properly kfree rdev->constraints in all set_machine_constraints() error paths. Also properly kfree rdev->constraints in regulator_register() error paths. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 3700d0953d73..a01954456752 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -794,7 +794,6 @@ static int machine_constraints_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, if (ret < 0) { rdev_err(rdev, "failed to apply %duV constraint\n", rdev->constraints->min_uV); - rdev->constraints = NULL; return ret; } } @@ -897,7 +896,6 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev, ret = suspend_prepare(rdev, rdev->constraints->initial_state); if (ret < 0) { rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set suspend state\n"); - rdev->constraints = NULL; goto out; } } @@ -924,13 +922,15 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev, ret = ops->enable(rdev); if (ret < 0) { rdev_err(rdev, "failed to enable\n"); - rdev->constraints = NULL; goto out; } } print_constraints(rdev); + return 0; out: + kfree(rdev->constraints); + rdev->constraints = NULL; return ret; } @@ -2701,6 +2701,7 @@ struct regulator_dev *regulator_register(struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc, unset_regulator_supplies(rdev); scrub: + kfree(rdev->constraints); device_unregister(&rdev->dev); /* device core frees rdev */ rdev = ERR_PTR(ret); From 54abd335fda86d305845f9e62b4bc0997386eb66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:07:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 17/23] regulator: Fix argument format type errors in error prints We need to dereference the pointers to print their values. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index a01954456752..d8e6a429e8ba 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int regulator_check_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, if (*min_uV > *max_uV) { rdev_err(rdev, "unsupportable voltage range: %d-%duV\n", - min_uV, max_uV); + *min_uV, *max_uV); return -EINVAL; } @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int regulator_check_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev, if (*min_uA > *max_uA) { rdev_err(rdev, "unsupportable current range: %d-%duA\n", - min_uA, max_uA); + *min_uA, *max_uA); return -EINVAL; } From 137a6354305455d585fe99fe5e9949acd895b045 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 18/23] regulator: Fix WM831x regulator ID lookups for multiple WM831xs With multiple wm831x devices the device IDs used for the regulators will not always be contiguous so simply taking the modulus is not sufficient to look up the ID, we need to reverse the way the ID is generated. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c index a0982e809851..0c7a9d5047f4 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c @@ -504,11 +504,17 @@ static __devinit int wm831x_buckv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct wm831x *wm831x = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct wm831x_pdata *pdata = wm831x->dev->platform_data; - int id = pdev->id % ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->dcdc); + int id; struct wm831x_dcdc *dcdc; struct resource *res; int ret, irq; + if (pdata && pdata->wm831x_num) + id = (pdata->wm831x_num * 10) + 1; + else + id = 0; + id = pdev->id - id; + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probing DCDC%d\n", id + 1); if (pdata == NULL || pdata->dcdc[id] == NULL) @@ -709,11 +715,17 @@ static __devinit int wm831x_buckp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct wm831x *wm831x = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct wm831x_pdata *pdata = wm831x->dev->platform_data; - int id = pdev->id % ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->dcdc); + int id; struct wm831x_dcdc *dcdc; struct resource *res; int ret, irq; + if (pdata && pdata->wm831x_num) + id = (pdata->wm831x_num * 10) + 1; + else + id = 0; + id = pdev->id - id; + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probing DCDC%d\n", id + 1); if (pdata == NULL || pdata->dcdc[id] == NULL) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c index 2220cf8defb1..6709710a059e 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c @@ -310,11 +310,17 @@ static __devinit int wm831x_gp_ldo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct wm831x *wm831x = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct wm831x_pdata *pdata = wm831x->dev->platform_data; - int id = pdev->id % ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->ldo); + int id; struct wm831x_ldo *ldo; struct resource *res; int ret, irq; + if (pdata && pdata->wm831x_num) + id = (pdata->wm831x_num * 10) + 1; + else + id = 0; + id = pdev->id - id; + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probing LDO%d\n", id + 1); if (pdata == NULL || pdata->ldo[id] == NULL) @@ -574,11 +580,17 @@ static __devinit int wm831x_aldo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct wm831x *wm831x = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct wm831x_pdata *pdata = wm831x->dev->platform_data; - int id = pdev->id % ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->ldo); + int id; struct wm831x_ldo *ldo; struct resource *res; int ret, irq; + if (pdata && pdata->wm831x_num) + id = (pdata->wm831x_num * 10) + 1; + else + id = 0; + id = pdev->id - id; + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probing LDO%d\n", id + 1); if (pdata == NULL || pdata->ldo[id] == NULL) @@ -764,11 +776,18 @@ static __devinit int wm831x_alive_ldo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct wm831x *wm831x = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct wm831x_pdata *pdata = wm831x->dev->platform_data; - int id = pdev->id % ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->ldo); + int id; struct wm831x_ldo *ldo; struct resource *res; int ret; + if (pdata && pdata->wm831x_num) + id = (pdata->wm831x_num * 10) + 1; + else + id = 0; + id = pdev->id - id; + + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probing LDO%d\n", id + 1); if (pdata == NULL || pdata->ldo[id] == NULL) From a1b81dd3ff2c622d0f4e3954bf9b5dd47a0f13a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 19/23] regulator: Fix WM831x DCDC DVS VSEL bootstrapping Read our initial VSEL from the correct register. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c index 0c7a9d5047f4..8a4fdc3a45d9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static __devinit int wm831x_buckv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } dcdc->on_vsel = ret & WM831X_DC1_ON_VSEL_MASK; - ret = wm831x_reg_read(wm831x, dcdc->base + WM831X_DCDC_ON_CONFIG); + ret = wm831x_reg_read(wm831x, dcdc->base + WM831X_DCDC_DVS_CONTROL); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Failed to read DVS VSEL: %d\n", ret); goto err; From 24b4315051ef2b9155d23ccbad528daab3b65eb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 20/23] regulator: Add EPEs to the MODULE_ALIAS() for wm831x-dcdc Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c index 8a4fdc3a45d9..2ee482306784 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c @@ -1058,3 +1058,4 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("WM831x DC-DC convertor driver"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_ALIAS("platform:wm831x-buckv"); MODULE_ALIAS("platform:wm831x-buckp"); +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:wm831x-epe"); From b47ba9fdd336b318a6a6431e6a4556df99272277 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 21/23] regulator: Set up GPIO for WM831x VSEL before enabling VSEL mode If the VSEL is not in use prior to us starting up then we need to make sure we initialise the GPIO before we push the DVS control to being done by the GPIO. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c index 2ee482306784..95249f7a0e39 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c @@ -456,27 +456,6 @@ static __devinit void wm831x_buckv_dvs_init(struct wm831x_dcdc *dcdc, if (!pdata || !pdata->dvs_gpio) return; - switch (pdata->dvs_control_src) { - case 1: - ctrl = 2 << WM831X_DC1_DVS_SRC_SHIFT; - break; - case 2: - ctrl = 3 << WM831X_DC1_DVS_SRC_SHIFT; - break; - default: - dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Invalid DVS control source %d for %s\n", - pdata->dvs_control_src, dcdc->name); - return; - } - - ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, dcdc->base + WM831X_DCDC_DVS_CONTROL, - WM831X_DC1_DVS_SRC_MASK, ctrl); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Failed to set %s DVS source: %d\n", - dcdc->name, ret); - return; - } - ret = gpio_request(pdata->dvs_gpio, "DCDC DVS"); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Failed to get %s DVS GPIO: %d\n", @@ -498,6 +477,26 @@ static __devinit void wm831x_buckv_dvs_init(struct wm831x_dcdc *dcdc, } dcdc->dvs_gpio = pdata->dvs_gpio; + + switch (pdata->dvs_control_src) { + case 1: + ctrl = 2 << WM831X_DC1_DVS_SRC_SHIFT; + break; + case 2: + ctrl = 3 << WM831X_DC1_DVS_SRC_SHIFT; + break; + default: + dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Invalid DVS control source %d for %s\n", + pdata->dvs_control_src, dcdc->name); + return; + } + + ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, dcdc->base + WM831X_DCDC_DVS_CONTROL, + WM831X_DC1_DVS_SRC_MASK, ctrl); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(wm831x->dev, "Failed to set %s DVS source: %d\n", + dcdc->name, ret); + } } static __devinit int wm831x_buckv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) From c439b8f46ee79147139e124621dbc9e1e7804655 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 22/23] regulator: Bootstrap wm831x DVS VSEL value from ON VSEL if not already set If we don't have a DVS VSEL value already set when we start up then start it off with the value currently being used for ON. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c index 95249f7a0e39..2c5d54b026c9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c @@ -491,6 +491,20 @@ static __devinit void wm831x_buckv_dvs_init(struct wm831x_dcdc *dcdc, return; } + /* If DVS_VSEL is set to the minimum value then raise it to ON_VSEL + * to make bootstrapping a bit smoother. + */ + if (!dcdc->dvs_vsel) { + ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, + dcdc->base + WM831X_DCDC_DVS_CONTROL, + WM831X_DC1_DVS_VSEL_MASK, dcdc->on_vsel); + if (ret == 0) + dcdc->dvs_vsel = dcdc->on_vsel; + else + dev_warn(wm831x->dev, "Failed to set DVS_VSEL: %d\n", + ret); + } + ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, dcdc->base + WM831X_DCDC_DVS_CONTROL, WM831X_DC1_DVS_SRC_MASK, ctrl); if (ret < 0) { From 88cda60e512373ca18a663ee66dc2550800223eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:20:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 23/23] regulator: Improve WM831x DVS VSEL selection algorithm Rather than using the maximum voltage we get passed to select the DVS voltage to use remember the highest voltage we've ever seen. This improves how the driver works when the consumer permits higher voltages than it will ever selects in order to support the widest possible voltage range. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c | 52 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c index 2c5d54b026c9..bd3531d8b2ac 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c @@ -267,23 +267,6 @@ static int wm831x_buckv_select_min_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, return vsel; } -static int wm831x_buckv_select_max_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, - int min_uV, int max_uV) -{ - u16 vsel; - - if (max_uV < 600000 || max_uV > 1800000) - return -EINVAL; - - vsel = ((max_uV - 600000) / 12500) + 8; - - if (wm831x_buckv_list_voltage(rdev, vsel) < min_uV || - wm831x_buckv_list_voltage(rdev, vsel) < max_uV) - return -EINVAL; - - return vsel; -} - static int wm831x_buckv_set_dvs(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int state) { struct wm831x_dcdc *dcdc = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev); @@ -338,28 +321,23 @@ static int wm831x_buckv_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, if (ret < 0) return ret; - /* Set the high voltage as the DVS voltage. This is optimised - * for CPUfreq usage, most processors will keep the maximum - * voltage constant and lower the minimum with the frequency. */ - vsel = wm831x_buckv_select_max_voltage(rdev, min_uV, max_uV); - if (vsel < 0) { - /* This should never happen - at worst the same vsel - * should be chosen */ - WARN_ON(vsel < 0); - return 0; + /* + * If this VSEL is higher than the last one we've seen then + * remember it as the DVS VSEL. This is optimised for CPUfreq + * usage where we want to get to the highest voltage very + * quickly. + */ + if (vsel > dcdc->dvs_vsel) { + ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, dvs_reg, + WM831X_DC1_DVS_VSEL_MASK, + dcdc->dvs_vsel); + if (ret == 0) + dcdc->dvs_vsel = vsel; + else + dev_warn(wm831x->dev, + "Failed to set DCDC DVS VSEL: %d\n", ret); } - /* Don't bother if it's the same VSEL we're already using */ - if (vsel == dcdc->on_vsel) - return 0; - - ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, dvs_reg, WM831X_DC1_DVS_VSEL_MASK, vsel); - if (ret == 0) - dcdc->dvs_vsel = vsel; - else - dev_warn(wm831x->dev, "Failed to set DCDC DVS VSEL: %d\n", - ret); - return 0; }