futex: Correct futex_wait_requeue_pi() commentary
The state machine described in the comments wasn't updated with a follow-on fix. Address that and cleanup the corresponding commentary in the function. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> LKML-Reference: <4A737C2A.9090001@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a33a052f19
commit
cc6db4e601
1 changed files with 10 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -2102,11 +2102,11 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
|
|||
* We call schedule in futex_wait_queue_me() when we enqueue and return there
|
||||
* via the following:
|
||||
* 1) wakeup on uaddr2 after an atomic lock acquisition by futex_requeue()
|
||||
* 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue and subsequent unlock
|
||||
* 3) signal (before or after requeue)
|
||||
* 4) timeout (before or after requeue)
|
||||
* 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue
|
||||
* 3) signal
|
||||
* 4) timeout
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If 3, we setup a restart_block with futex_wait_requeue_pi() as the function.
|
||||
* If 3, cleanup and return -ERESTARTNOINTR.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If 2, we may then block on trying to take the rt_mutex and return via:
|
||||
* 5) successful lock
|
||||
|
@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
|
|||
* 7) timeout
|
||||
* 8) other lock acquisition failure
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If 6, we setup a restart_block with futex_lock_pi() as the function.
|
||||
* If 6, return -EWOULDBLOCK (restarting the syscall would do the same).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -2232,14 +2232,11 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared,
|
|||
rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex);
|
||||
} else if (ret == -EINTR) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've already been requeued, but we have no way to
|
||||
* restart by calling futex_lock_pi() directly. We
|
||||
* could restart the syscall, but that will look at
|
||||
* the user space value and return right away. So we
|
||||
* drop back with EWOULDBLOCK to tell user space that
|
||||
* "val" has been changed. That's the same what the
|
||||
* restart of the syscall would do in
|
||||
* futex_wait_setup().
|
||||
* We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling
|
||||
* futex_lock_pi() directly. We could restart this syscall, but
|
||||
* it would detect that the user space "val" changed and return
|
||||
* -EWOULDBLOCK. Save the overhead of the restart and return
|
||||
* -EWOULDBLOCK directly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue