From c4197c6298750d308fc819c0525902f49ab920fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 08:56:35 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] iwlagn: donot process bt update when bt coex disable
If bt coex is disabled, do not process any bt related information
from uCode even received.
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
index 3aa486437509..325ff5c89ee8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
@@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@ void iwlagn_send_advance_bt_config(struct iwl_priv *priv)
* IBSS mode (no proper uCode support for coex then).
*/
if (!bt_coex_active || priv->iw_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) {
- bt_cmd.flags = 0;
+ bt_cmd.flags = IWLAGN_BT_FLAG_COEX_MODE_DISABLED;
} else {
bt_cmd.flags = IWLAGN_BT_FLAG_COEX_MODE_3W <<
IWLAGN_BT_FLAG_COEX_MODE_SHIFT;
@@ -1869,6 +1869,11 @@ static void iwlagn_bt_traffic_change_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx;
int smps_request = -1;
+ if (priv->bt_enable_flag == IWLAGN_BT_FLAG_COEX_MODE_DISABLED) {
+ /* bt coex disabled */
+ return;
+ }
+
/*
* Note: bt_traffic_load can be overridden by scan complete and
* coex profile notifications. Ignore that since only bad consequence
@@ -2022,6 +2027,11 @@ void iwlagn_bt_coex_profile_notif(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct iwl_bt_coex_profile_notif *coex = &pkt->u.bt_coex_profile_notif;
struct iwl_bt_uart_msg *uart_msg = &coex->last_bt_uart_msg;
+ if (priv->bt_enable_flag == IWLAGN_BT_FLAG_COEX_MODE_DISABLED) {
+ /* bt coex disabled */
+ return;
+ }
+
IWL_DEBUG_NOTIF(priv, "BT Coex notification:\n");
IWL_DEBUG_NOTIF(priv, " status: %d\n", coex->bt_status);
IWL_DEBUG_NOTIF(priv, " traffic load: %d\n", coex->bt_traffic_load);