Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

cfq-iosched: cleanup unreachable code

Browse source 
cfq_should_idle returns false for no-idle queues that are not the last,
so the control flow will never reach the removed code in a state that
satisfies the if condition.
The unreachable code was added to emulate previous cfq behaviour for
non-NCQ rotational devices. My tests show that even without it, the
performances and fairness are comparable with previous cfq, thanks to
the fact that all seeky queues are grouped together, and that we idle at
the end of the tree.

Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Corrado Zoccolo 2009-11-26 09:41:21 +01:00 committed by Jens Axboe
parent 2d4dc890b5
commit c16632bab1
1 changed files with 0 additions and 13 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
block/cfq-iosched.c
View file

@ -1269,19 +1269,6 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
cfq_mark_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq);
sl = cfqd->cfq_slice_idle;
/* are we servicing noidle tree, and there are more queues?
* non-rotational or NCQ: no idle
* non-NCQ rotational : very small idle, to allow
* fair distribution of slice time for a process doing back-to-back
* seeks.
*/
if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
service_tree_for(cfqd->serving_prio, SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD, cfqd)
->count > 0) {
if (blk_queue_nonrot(cfqd->queue) || cfqd->hw_tag)
return;
sl = min(sl, msecs_to_jiffies(CFQ_MIN_TT));
}
mod_timer(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer, jiffies + sl);
cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "arm_idle: %lu", sl);