fork: record start_time late
commit 7b55851367136b1efd84d98fea81ba57a98304cf upstream. This changes the fork(2) syscall to record the process start_time after initializing the basic task structure but still before making the new process visible to user-space. Technically, we could record the start_time anytime during fork(2). But this might lead to scenarios where a start_time is recorded long before a process becomes visible to user-space. For instance, with userfaultfd(2) and TLS, user-space can delay the execution of fork(2) for an indefinite amount of time (and will, if this causes network access, or similar). By recording the start_time late, it much closer reflects the point in time where the process becomes live and can be observed by other processes. Lastly, this makes it much harder for user-space to predict and control the start_time they get assigned. Previously, user-space could fork a process and stall it in copy_thread_tls() before its pid is allocated, but after its start_time is recorded. This can be misused to later-on cycle through PIDs and resume the stalled fork(2) yielding a process that has the same pid and start_time as a process that existed before. This can be used to circumvent security systems that identify processes by their pid+start_time combination. Even though user-space was always aware that start_time recording is flaky (but several projects are known to still rely on start_time-based identification), changing the start_time to be recorded late will help mitigate existing attacks and make it much harder for user-space to control the start_time a process gets assigned. Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d257d4299a
commit
bc999b5099
1 changed files with 11 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -1784,8 +1784,6 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
|
|||
|
||||
posix_cpu_timers_init(p);
|
||||
|
||||
p->start_time = ktime_get_ns();
|
||||
p->real_start_time = ktime_get_boot_ns();
|
||||
p->io_context = NULL;
|
||||
audit_set_context(p, NULL);
|
||||
cgroup_fork(p);
|
||||
|
@ -1949,6 +1947,17 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
|
|||
if (retval)
|
||||
goto bad_fork_free_pid;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* From this point on we must avoid any synchronous user-space
|
||||
* communication until we take the tasklist-lock. In particular, we do
|
||||
* not want user-space to be able to predict the process start-time by
|
||||
* stalling fork(2) after we recorded the start_time but before it is
|
||||
* visible to the system.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
p->start_time = ktime_get_ns();
|
||||
p->real_start_time = ktime_get_boot_ns();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make it visible to the rest of the system, but dont wake it up yet.
|
||||
* Need tasklist lock for parent etc handling!
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue