rcu: Make RCU lockdep check the lockdep_recursion variable
The lockdep facility temporarily disables lockdep checking by incrementing the current->lockdep_recursion variable. Such disabling happens in NMIs and in other situations where lockdep might expect to recurse on itself. This patch therefore checks current->lockdep_recursion, disabling RCU lockdep splats when this variable is non-zero. In addition, this patch removes the "likely()", as suggested by Lai Jiangshan. Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com LKML-Reference: <20100415195039.GA22623@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
50aec0024e
commit
bc293d62b2
2 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -101,10 +101,7 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
|
|||
# define rcu_read_release_sched() \
|
||||
lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return likely(rcu_scheduler_active && debug_locks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* rcu_read_lock_held - might we be in RCU read-side critical section?
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -69,6 +69,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_scheduler_active);
|
|||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
||||
|
||||
int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return rcu_scheduler_active && debug_locks &&
|
||||
current->lockdep_recursion == 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* rcu_read_lock_bh_held - might we be in RCU-bh read-side critical section?
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue