net: dccp: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that for options.c file, I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a600d97cb
commit
bc28df6e85
2 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static int dccp_rcv_respond_partopen_state_process(struct sock *sk,
|
|||
case DCCP_PKT_DATA:
|
||||
if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_RESPOND)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case DCCP_PKT_DATAACK:
|
||||
case DCCP_PKT_ACK:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct dccp_request_sock *dreq,
|
|||
* Ack vectors are processed by the TX CCID if it is
|
||||
* interested. The RX CCID need not parse Ack Vectors,
|
||||
* since it is only interested in clearing old state.
|
||||
* Fall through.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case DCCPO_MIN_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC ... DCCPO_MAX_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC:
|
||||
if (ccid_hc_tx_parse_options(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk,
|
||||
pkt_type, opt, value, len))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue